Comparison of V/Q SPECT and planar V/Q lung scintigraphy in diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism

Henrik Gutte Borgwardt, Jann Mortensen, Claus Verner Jensen, Peter Von Der Recke, Claus Leth Petersen, Ulrik Sloth Kristoffersen, Andreas Kjær

    75 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    PURPOSE: Planar ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy is currently the standard method for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in most nuclear medicine centers. However, recent studies have shown a superior sensitivity and specificity when applying V/Q single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in diagnosing PE. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of three-dimensional V/Q SPECT in comparison with planar V/Q scintigraphy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients suspected of acute PE from June 2006 to February 2008 were referred to the Department of Nuclear Medicine at Frederiksberg Hospital, Denmark to a V/Q SPECT, as the first-line imaging procedure. Patients with positive D-dimer (>0.5mg/l) or after clinical assessment with a Wells score of more than 2 were included and had a V/Q SPECT, low-dose CT, planar V/Q scintigraphy, and pulmonary multidetector computer tomography angiography performed the same day. Ventilation studies were performed using 81mKr. Patient follow-up was at least 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 36 patient studies were available for analysis, of which 11 (31%) had PE. V/Q SPECT had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 87%. Planar V/Q scintigraphy had a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 72%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that V/Q SPECT has a superior diagnostic performance compared with planar V/Q scintigraphy and should be preferred when diagnosing PE.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalNuclear Medicine Communications
    Volume31
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)82-6
    Number of pages5
    ISSN0143-3636
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of V/Q SPECT and planar V/Q lung scintigraphy in diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this