Comparison of the manual and computer-aided techniques for evaluation of wrist synovitis using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI on a dedicated scanner

Mikael Boesen, Olga Kubassova, Massimiliano Parodi, Henning Bliddal, Stefania Innocenti, Giacomo Garlaschi, Marco A Cimmino

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: Traditional methods for assessment of synovial inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis such as clinical examination, immunohistology of bioptic samples, scintigraphy, and radiography have several limitations, including lack of sensitivity, need of invasive techniques, and administration of radioactive material. MRI lacks on standardisation and the data are often analysed using laborious, relatively rigid scoring methods. Materials and methods: This study introduces a standardized computer-aided method for quantitative analysis of MRI of the wrist on a dedicated scanner. Assessment of the synovial inflammation was performed using a semi-automated model-based method in conjunction with patient motion reduction algorithms. Further, the new method was compared with the traditional user-dependent ROI-based technique. Results: The computer-aided technique generated robust and reproducible results. Application of motion reduction algorithms allowed for significant improvements of the signal to noise ratio, which is especially important in the datasets acquired with low-field scanners. Conclusion: The use of the computer software can be beneficial for diagnostic decision in cross sectional as well as longitudinal MRI examinations of the wrist in rheumatoid arthritis.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalEuropean Journal of Radiology
    Volume77
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)202-6
    Number of pages5
    ISSN0720-048X
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the manual and computer-aided techniques for evaluation of wrist synovitis using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI on a dedicated scanner'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this