TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of the antidepressant effects of venlafaxine and dosulepin in a naturalistic setting
AU - Bukh, Jens Drachmann
AU - Jørgensen, Martin Balslev
AU - Dam, Henrik
AU - Plenge, Per
AU - Bukh, Jens Drachmann
AU - Jørgensen, Martin Balslev
AU - Dam, Henrik
AU - Plenge, Per
N1 - Keywords: Adult; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Cyclohexanols; Denmark; Depressive Disorder, Major; Dothiepin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - The relative efficacy of the various classes of antidepressants has not been established. Observational studies in naturalistic settings are important in evaluating treatment outcomes with antidepressants, since controlled clinical trials include only a minority of patients present in clinical practice. This study sought to evaluate in a naturalistic setting the treatment outcomes of dosulepin and venlafaxine for patients with depressive episodes. At the university hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark, between 1998 and early 2001, the first-line treatment for psychiatric inpatients with depression was dosulepin; after that time, venlafaxine was the first-line medication. We compared the treatment outcomes among inpatients during the respective periods. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome parameters between the two groups. A tendency in favour of dosulepin confirmed by a post-hoc analysis suggested that the failure to achieve significant difference was related to a type 2 error. However, missing data and possible confounders related to the different treatment periods weaken the results. This naturalistic study showed a non-significant trend for poorer treatment outcomes (probably because of an underpowered design) after replacing dosulepin with venlafaxine as first-line drug for depression in a naturalistic inpatient setting.
AB - The relative efficacy of the various classes of antidepressants has not been established. Observational studies in naturalistic settings are important in evaluating treatment outcomes with antidepressants, since controlled clinical trials include only a minority of patients present in clinical practice. This study sought to evaluate in a naturalistic setting the treatment outcomes of dosulepin and venlafaxine for patients with depressive episodes. At the university hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark, between 1998 and early 2001, the first-line treatment for psychiatric inpatients with depression was dosulepin; after that time, venlafaxine was the first-line medication. We compared the treatment outcomes among inpatients during the respective periods. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome parameters between the two groups. A tendency in favour of dosulepin confirmed by a post-hoc analysis suggested that the failure to achieve significant difference was related to a type 2 error. However, missing data and possible confounders related to the different treatment periods weaken the results. This naturalistic study showed a non-significant trend for poorer treatment outcomes (probably because of an underpowered design) after replacing dosulepin with venlafaxine as first-line drug for depression in a naturalistic inpatient setting.
U2 - 10.1080/08039480902799099
DO - 10.1080/08039480902799099
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 19347769
SN - 0803-9488
VL - 63
SP - 347
EP - 351
JO - Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
JF - Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
IS - 4
ER -