Comparing book citations in humanities journals to library holdings: Scholarly use versus 'perceived cultural benefit' (RIP)

Alesia Zuccala, Raf Guns

    19 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this paper we examine the statistical relationship between citation counts to books referenced in SCOPUS humanities journals and library holding counts ('libcitations') retrieved from WorldCat®. Our focus is on books (with ISBN numbers) published between 2001-2006, which received citations in History and Literature & Literary Theory journals during the period of 2007-2011. A Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used, and our test resulted in significant correlations between the citations and 'libcitations'. We present and discuss the details of our dataset (extracted from a much larger, newly constructed database), and comment on why the 'perceived cultural benefit' of holding a book in a research library can lead to, but may not necessarily lead to use (i.e., a citation) of that book in new humanities research.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference
    Number of pages8
    Volume1
    Publication date1 Dec 2013
    Pages353-360
    ISBN (Print)9783200031357
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2013
    Event14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, ISSI 2013 - Vienna, Austria
    Duration: 15 Jul 201320 Jul 2013

    Conference

    Conference14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, ISSI 2013
    Country/TerritoryAustria
    CityVienna
    Period15/07/201320/07/2013
    SponsorASIS and T, USA, Elsevier B.V., EBSCO Information Services, USA, Federal Ministry for Science and Research, Austria, Federal Ministry for Trans., Innov. and Technol., Austria, et al

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing book citations in humanities journals to library holdings: Scholarly use versus 'perceived cultural benefit' (RIP)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this