Cognitive ability and risk aversion: A systematic review and meta analysis

    7 Citations (Scopus)
    157 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Are highly intelligent people less risk averse? Over the last two decades scholars have argued the existence of a negative relationship between cognitive ability and risk aversion. Although numerous studies support this, the link between cognitive ability and risk aversion has not been found consistently. To shed new light on this topic, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. A total of 97 studies were identified and included for meta-analysis in the domain of gains (N=90,723), 41 in the mixed domain (N=50,936), and 12 in the domain of losses (N=4,544). Results indicate that there exists a weak, but significant negative relationship between cognitive ability and risk aversion in the domain of gains. However, no relationship was observed in the mixed domain or in the domain of losses. Several meta-regressions were performed to investigate the influence of moderator variables. None of the moderator variables were found to consistently influence the relationship between cognitive ability and risk aversion across the domain of gains, mixed and losses. Moreover, no significant difference was observed between males and females across all three domains. In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis provides new evidence that the relationship between cognitive ability and risk aversion is domain specific and not as strong as suggested by some previous studies.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJudgment and Decision Making
    Volume14
    Issue number3
    Pages (from-to)234-279
    Number of pages45
    ISSN1930-2975
    Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2019

    Keywords

    • Faculty of Social Sciences
    • risk aversion
    • cognitive ability
    • risk preferences
    • intelligence
    • meta-analysis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive ability and risk aversion: A systematic review and meta analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this