Clues as information, the semiotic gap, and inferential investigative processes, or making a (very small) contribution to the new discipline, Forensic Semiotics

Bent Sørensen, Torkild Leo Thellefsen, Martin Muderspach Thellefsen

130 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article, we try to contribute to the new discipline Forensic Semiotics – a discipline introduced by the Canadian polymath Marcel Danesi. We focus on clues as information and criminal investigative processes as inferential. These inferential (and Peircean) processes have a certain complexity consisting of the interrelation between the collateral observations of the investigator, e. g., his background knowledge concerning criminal and technical analysis, the context that the investigator acts within or in relation to (the universe of discourse), e. g., the scene of crime or the criminal law, as well as the clues as information that will cause the inferential processes in the first place. We believe that this focus can tell us something about crime solving that is not just sensitive to epistemological factors (how to know), but also ontological (what to know) and normative factors as well (how to value the processes of crime solving).
Original languageEnglish
JournalSemiotica
Volume215
Pages (from-to)91-118
Number of pages28
ISSN0037-1998
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Keywords

  • Faculty of Humanities
  • Forensic Semiotics
  • clues as information
  • crime solving as inferential processes
  • C. S. Peirce

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clues as information, the semiotic gap, and inferential investigative processes, or making a (very small) contribution to the new discipline, Forensic Semiotics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this