Cloze tests may be quick, but are they dirty?: Development and preliminary validation of a cloze test of reading comprehension

Anna Steenberg Gellert; Carsten Elbro

doi:10.1177/0734282912451971

Cloze tests may be quick, but are they dirty? Development and preliminary validation of a cloze test of reading comprehension

Anna Steenberg Gellert, Carsten Elbro

Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A commonly held view is that cloze tests may well provide a quick measure of something reading related, but that they are not suitable for assessments of understanding of ideas beyond the sentence boundary. The present article presents challenges to this view. It is argued that word gaps can be carefully selected so that filling them in requires proper understanding of the ideas of the text. The reliability and validity of such a comprehension-focused cloze test was demonstrated in a study of 204 Danish adults attending reading courses or general education. The quick (10 min) cloze comprehension test correlated strongly (r = .84) with a standard (30 min) question-answering comprehension test. Only a small part of this correlation was accounted for by decoding ability or vocabulary. The cloze test was somewhat more sensitive to decoding ability than the question-answering comprehension test was, and it provided a better fit to the participants' self-reported reading difficulties.

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Volume	31
Issue number	1
Pages (from-to)	16-28
Number of pages	13
ISSN	0734-2829
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282912451971
Publication status	Published - Feb 2013

Access to Document

10.1177/0734282912451971

http://jpa.sagepub.com/content/31/1/16.abstract

Cite this

@article{e7c11af9fb964a569b83b1b67edddecd,

title = "Cloze tests may be quick, but are they dirty?: Development and preliminary validation of a cloze test of reading comprehension",

abstract = "A commonly held view is that cloze tests may well provide a quick measure of something reading related, but that they are not suitable for assessments of understanding of ideas beyond the sentence boundary. The present article presents challenges to this view. It is argued that word gaps can be carefully selected so that filling them in requires proper understanding of the ideas of the text. The reliability and validity of such a comprehension-focused cloze test was demonstrated in a study of 204 Danish adults attending reading courses or general education. The quick (10 min) cloze comprehension test correlated strongly (r = .84) with a standard (30 min) question-answering comprehension test. Only a small part of this correlation was accounted for by decoding ability or vocabulary. The cloze test was somewhat more sensitive to decoding ability than the question-answering comprehension test was, and it provided a better fit to the participants' self-reported reading difficulties.",

author = "Gellert, {Anna Steenberg} and Carsten Elbro",

year = "2013",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1177/0734282912451971",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "16--28",

journal = "Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment",

issn = "0734-2829",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cloze tests may be quick, but are they dirty?

T2 - Development and preliminary validation of a cloze test of reading comprehension

AU - Gellert, Anna Steenberg

AU - Elbro, Carsten

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - A commonly held view is that cloze tests may well provide a quick measure of something reading related, but that they are not suitable for assessments of understanding of ideas beyond the sentence boundary. The present article presents challenges to this view. It is argued that word gaps can be carefully selected so that filling them in requires proper understanding of the ideas of the text. The reliability and validity of such a comprehension-focused cloze test was demonstrated in a study of 204 Danish adults attending reading courses or general education. The quick (10 min) cloze comprehension test correlated strongly (r = .84) with a standard (30 min) question-answering comprehension test. Only a small part of this correlation was accounted for by decoding ability or vocabulary. The cloze test was somewhat more sensitive to decoding ability than the question-answering comprehension test was, and it provided a better fit to the participants' self-reported reading difficulties.

AB - A commonly held view is that cloze tests may well provide a quick measure of something reading related, but that they are not suitable for assessments of understanding of ideas beyond the sentence boundary. The present article presents challenges to this view. It is argued that word gaps can be carefully selected so that filling them in requires proper understanding of the ideas of the text. The reliability and validity of such a comprehension-focused cloze test was demonstrated in a study of 204 Danish adults attending reading courses or general education. The quick (10 min) cloze comprehension test correlated strongly (r = .84) with a standard (30 min) question-answering comprehension test. Only a small part of this correlation was accounted for by decoding ability or vocabulary. The cloze test was somewhat more sensitive to decoding ability than the question-answering comprehension test was, and it provided a better fit to the participants' self-reported reading difficulties.

U2 - 10.1177/0734282912451971

DO - 10.1177/0734282912451971

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0734-2829

VL - 31

SP - 16

EP - 28

JO - Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

JF - Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

IS - 1

ER -

Cloze tests may be quick, but are they dirty? Development and preliminary validation of a cloze test of reading comprehension

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this