Clinical Application of Variation in Replication Kinetics During Episodes of Post-transplant Cytomegalovirus Infections

I P Lodding, Henrik Sengeløv, C da Cunha-Bang, Martin Peter Iversen, Allan Rasmussen, F Gustafsson, J G Downing, Jesper Grarup, N Kirkby, C M Frederiksen, A Mocroft, S S Sørensen, Jens Lundgren, MATCH Programme Study Group

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in transplant recipients is reported to replicate with a doubling time of 1.2-2 days, and weekly screening is recommended for early diagnosis. We re-evaluated these features in our cohort of transplant recipients.

METHODS: The CMV doubling time of the first CMV infection in the first year post-transplant could be calculated for 193 recipients of haematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation. Factors determining the proportion of recipients with a high diagnostic CMV viral load (≥ 18,200 IU/mL) were explored using mathematical simulation.

FINDINGS: The overall median doubling time was 4.3 days (IQR 2.5-7.8) and was not influenced by prior CMV immunity, or type of transplantation (p > 0.4). Assuming a fixed doubling time of 1.3 days and screening intervals of 7 or 10 days, 11.1% and 33.3% were projected to have a high CMV viral load at diagnosis, compared to 1.4% and 4.3% if the doubling time varies as observed in our cohort. Consistently, 1.9% of recipients screened weekly had a high diagnostic virus load.

INTERPRETATION: Screening intervals can be extended to 10 days in cohorts with comparable CMV doubling time, whereas shorter than 7 days is required in cohorts with shorter doubling times to maintain pre-emptive screening quality.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEBioMedicine
Volume2
Issue number7
Pages (from-to)699-705
Number of pages7
ISSN2352-3964
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Application of Variation in Replication Kinetics During Episodes of Post-transplant Cytomegalovirus Infections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this