Classical databases and knowledge organization: A case for Boolean retrieval and human decision-making during searches

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classical databases and knowledge organization

T2 - A case for Boolean retrieval and human decision-making during searches

AU - Hjørland, Birger

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - This paper considers classical bibliographic databases based on the Boolean retrieval model (such as MEDLINE and PsycInfo). This model is challenged by modern search engines and information retrieval (IR) researchers, who often consider Boolean retrieval a less efficient approach. The paper examines this claim and argues for the continued value of Boolean systems, and suggests two further considerations: (a) the important role of human expertise in searching (expert searchers and "information literate" users) and (b) the role of library and information science and knowledge organization (KO) in the design and use of classical databases. An underlying issue is the kind of retrieval system for which one should aim. Warner's (2010) differentiation between the computer science traditions and an older library-oriented tradition seems important; the former aim to transform queries automatically into (ranked) sets of relevant documents, whereas the latter aims to increase the "selection power" of users. The Boolean retrieval model is valuable in providing users with the power to make informed searches and have full control over what is found and what is not. These issues may have significant implications for the maintenance of information science and KO as research fields as well as for the information profession as a profession in its own right.

AB - This paper considers classical bibliographic databases based on the Boolean retrieval model (such as MEDLINE and PsycInfo). This model is challenged by modern search engines and information retrieval (IR) researchers, who often consider Boolean retrieval a less efficient approach. The paper examines this claim and argues for the continued value of Boolean systems, and suggests two further considerations: (a) the important role of human expertise in searching (expert searchers and "information literate" users) and (b) the role of library and information science and knowledge organization (KO) in the design and use of classical databases. An underlying issue is the kind of retrieval system for which one should aim. Warner's (2010) differentiation between the computer science traditions and an older library-oriented tradition seems important; the former aim to transform queries automatically into (ranked) sets of relevant documents, whereas the latter aims to increase the "selection power" of users. The Boolean retrieval model is valuable in providing users with the power to make informed searches and have full control over what is found and what is not. These issues may have significant implications for the maintenance of information science and KO as research fields as well as for the information profession as a profession in its own right.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - klassiske databaser

KW - Boolesk søgning

KW - søgemaskiner

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23250/abstract

U2 - 10.1002/asi.23250

DO - 10.1002/asi.23250

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0913-3801

VL - 66

SP - 1559

EP - 1575

JO - Information Science and Technology Association. Journal

JF - Information Science and Technology Association. Journal

IS - 8

ER -