Cardiac rehabilitation versus usual care for patients treated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Results of the randomized CopenHeartRFA trial

Signe S Risom; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler; Trine Bernholdt Rasmussen; Kirstine Lærum Sibilitz; Trine L S Madsen; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen; Christian Gluud; Jane Lindschou; Per Winkel; Selina Kikkenborg Berg

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2016.08.013

Cardiac rehabilitation versus usual care for patients treated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Results of the randomized CopenHeartRFA trial

Signe S Risom, Ann-Dorthe Zwisler, Trine Bernholdt Rasmussen, Kirstine Lærum Sibilitz, Trine L S Madsen, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen, Christian Gluud, Jane Lindschou, Per Winkel, Selina Kikkenborg Berg

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To assess the effects of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation compared with usual care on physical activity and mental health for patients treated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Methods The patients were randomized 1:1 stratified by paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation and sex to cardiac rehabilitation consisting of 12 weeks physical exercise and four psycho-educational consultations plus usual care (cardiac rehabilitation group) versus usual care. The primary outcome was VO₂ peak. The secondary outcome was self-rated mental health measured by the Short Form-36 questionnaire. Exploratory outcomes were collected. Results 210 patients were included (mean age: 59 years, 74% men), 72% had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation prior to ablation. Compared with usual care, the cardiac rehabilitation group had a beneficial effect on VO₂ peak at four months (24.3 mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹ versus 20.7 mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹, p of main effect = 0.003, p of interaction between time and intervention = 0.020). No significant difference between groups on Short Form-36 was found (53.8 versus 51.9 points, P = .20). Two serious adverse events (atrial fibrillation in relation to physical exercise and death unrelated to rehabilitation) occurred in the cardiac rehabilitation group versus one in the usual care group (death unrelated to intervention) (P = .56). In the cardiac rehabilitation group 16 patients versus 7 in the usual care group reported non-serious adverse events (P = .047). Conclusion Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation had a positive effect on physical capacity compared with usual care, but not on mental health. Cardiac rehabilitation caused more non-serious adverse events.

Original language	English
Journal	American Heart Journal
Volume	181
Pages (from-to)	120-129
Number of pages	10
ISSN	0002-8703
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2016.08.013
Publication status	Published - 1 Nov 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ahj.2016.08.013

Cite this

Risom, S. S., Zwisler, A-D., Rasmussen, T. B., Sibilitz, K. L., Madsen, T. L. S., Svendsen, J. H., Gluud, C., Lindschou, J., Winkel, P., & Berg, S. K. (2016). Cardiac rehabilitation versus usual care for patients treated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Results of the randomized CopenHeartRFA trial. American Heart Journal, 181, 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2016.08.013

Cardiac rehabilitation versus usual care for patients treated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation : Results of the randomized CopenHeartRFA trial. / Risom, Signe S; Zwisler, Ann-Dorthe; Rasmussen, Trine Bernholdt et al.

In: American Heart Journal, Vol. 181, 01.11.2016, p. 120-129.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Risom, SS, Zwisler, A-D, Rasmussen, TB, Sibilitz, KL, Madsen, TLS, Svendsen, JH, Gluud, C, Lindschou, J, Winkel, P & Berg, SK 2016, 'Cardiac rehabilitation versus usual care for patients treated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Results of the randomized CopenHeartRFA trial', American Heart Journal, vol. 181, pp. 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2016.08.013

@article{df6158c4b6cd43e88bfa9431ba7c7125,

title = "Cardiac rehabilitation versus usual care for patients treated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Results of the randomized CopenHeartRFA trial",

abstract = "To assess the effects of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation compared with usual care on physical activity and mental health for patients treated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Methods The patients were randomized 1:1 stratified by paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation and sex to cardiac rehabilitation consisting of 12 weeks physical exercise and four psycho-educational consultations plus usual care (cardiac rehabilitation group) versus usual care. The primary outcome was VO2 peak. The secondary outcome was self-rated mental health measured by the Short Form-36 questionnaire. Exploratory outcomes were collected. Results 210 patients were included (mean age: 59 years, 74% men), 72% had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation prior to ablation. Compared with usual care, the cardiac rehabilitation group had a beneficial effect on VO2 peak at four months (24.3 mL kg−1 min−1 versus 20.7 mL kg−1 min−1, p of main effect = 0.003, p of interaction between time and intervention = 0.020). No significant difference between groups on Short Form-36 was found (53.8 versus 51.9 points, P = .20). Two serious adverse events (atrial fibrillation in relation to physical exercise and death unrelated to rehabilitation) occurred in the cardiac rehabilitation group versus one in the usual care group (death unrelated to intervention) (P = .56). In the cardiac rehabilitation group 16 patients versus 7 in the usual care group reported non-serious adverse events (P = .047). Conclusion Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation had a positive effect on physical capacity compared with usual care, but not on mental health. Cardiac rehabilitation caused more non-serious adverse events.",

author = "Risom, {Signe S} and Ann-Dorthe Zwisler and Rasmussen, {Trine Bernholdt} and Sibilitz, {Kirstine L{\ae}rum} and Madsen, {Trine L S} and Svendsen, {Jesper Hastrup} and Christian Gluud and Jane Lindschou and Per Winkel and Berg, {Selina Kikkenborg}",

year = "2016",

month = nov,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.ahj.2016.08.013",

language = "English",

volume = "181",

pages = "120--129",

journal = "American Heart Journal",

issn = "0002-8703",

publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiac rehabilitation versus usual care for patients treated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

T2 - Results of the randomized CopenHeartRFA trial

AU - Risom, Signe S

AU - Zwisler, Ann-Dorthe

AU - Rasmussen, Trine Bernholdt

AU - Sibilitz, Kirstine Lærum

AU - Madsen, Trine L S

AU - Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup

AU - Gluud, Christian

AU - Lindschou, Jane

AU - Winkel, Per

AU - Berg, Selina Kikkenborg

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - To assess the effects of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation compared with usual care on physical activity and mental health for patients treated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Methods The patients were randomized 1:1 stratified by paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation and sex to cardiac rehabilitation consisting of 12 weeks physical exercise and four psycho-educational consultations plus usual care (cardiac rehabilitation group) versus usual care. The primary outcome was VO2 peak. The secondary outcome was self-rated mental health measured by the Short Form-36 questionnaire. Exploratory outcomes were collected. Results 210 patients were included (mean age: 59 years, 74% men), 72% had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation prior to ablation. Compared with usual care, the cardiac rehabilitation group had a beneficial effect on VO2 peak at four months (24.3 mL kg−1 min−1 versus 20.7 mL kg−1 min−1, p of main effect = 0.003, p of interaction between time and intervention = 0.020). No significant difference between groups on Short Form-36 was found (53.8 versus 51.9 points, P = .20). Two serious adverse events (atrial fibrillation in relation to physical exercise and death unrelated to rehabilitation) occurred in the cardiac rehabilitation group versus one in the usual care group (death unrelated to intervention) (P = .56). In the cardiac rehabilitation group 16 patients versus 7 in the usual care group reported non-serious adverse events (P = .047). Conclusion Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation had a positive effect on physical capacity compared with usual care, but not on mental health. Cardiac rehabilitation caused more non-serious adverse events.

AB - To assess the effects of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation compared with usual care on physical activity and mental health for patients treated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Methods The patients were randomized 1:1 stratified by paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation and sex to cardiac rehabilitation consisting of 12 weeks physical exercise and four psycho-educational consultations plus usual care (cardiac rehabilitation group) versus usual care. The primary outcome was VO2 peak. The secondary outcome was self-rated mental health measured by the Short Form-36 questionnaire. Exploratory outcomes were collected. Results 210 patients were included (mean age: 59 years, 74% men), 72% had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation prior to ablation. Compared with usual care, the cardiac rehabilitation group had a beneficial effect on VO2 peak at four months (24.3 mL kg−1 min−1 versus 20.7 mL kg−1 min−1, p of main effect = 0.003, p of interaction between time and intervention = 0.020). No significant difference between groups on Short Form-36 was found (53.8 versus 51.9 points, P = .20). Two serious adverse events (atrial fibrillation in relation to physical exercise and death unrelated to rehabilitation) occurred in the cardiac rehabilitation group versus one in the usual care group (death unrelated to intervention) (P = .56). In the cardiac rehabilitation group 16 patients versus 7 in the usual care group reported non-serious adverse events (P = .047). Conclusion Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation had a positive effect on physical capacity compared with usual care, but not on mental health. Cardiac rehabilitation caused more non-serious adverse events.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.08.013

DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.08.013

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27823683

SN - 0002-8703

VL - 181

SP - 120

EP - 129

JO - American Heart Journal

JF - American Heart Journal

ER -

Cardiac rehabilitation versus usual care for patients treated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Results of the randomized CopenHeartRFA trial

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this