Bone diagenesis in the European Holocene II: taphonomic and environmental considerations

C. M. Nielsen-Marsh*, C. I. Smith, M. M.E. Jans, A. Nord, H. Kars, M. J. Collins

*Corresponding author for this work
    106 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We have applied cluster analysis to mercury intrusion porosimetry data from 219 archaeological bones (121 human and 98 animal) and soil chemistry data from 219 accompanying soil samples (1 per bone sample), to investigate the influence of soil chemistry on bone preservation. The samples chosen for the study were obtained from sites ranging in time from the pre-modern to the Mesolithic and were representative of burial environments across Europe (from the Baltic to the Mediterranean). These results represent the single largest database for archaeological bone preservation in the European Holocene to date and demonstrate the potential for large-scale diagenetic studies to help develop long term preservation strategies for our European heritage. Despite the variety of sites and environments, bones could be categorised into only four main diagenetic types. Furthermore, soil chemistry appears to significantly affect only one type of preservation, the pathway characterised by loss of mineral. In neutral to basic soils, taphonomy and in particular the differences between the treatment of human and animal remains, becomes the dominating factor in determining preservation. Using these results, strategies for heritage management of archaeological sites can be suggested; grouping sites into those requiring immediate excavation and those where in situ preservation is viable.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Archaeological Science
    Volume34
    Issue number9
    Pages (from-to)1523-1531
    Number of pages9
    ISSN0305-4403
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2007

    Keywords

    • Bone diagenesis
    • Heritage Management
    • Holocene
    • Mercury intrusion porosimetry

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bone diagenesis in the European Holocene II: taphonomic and environmental considerations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this