Beyond the Neolithic transition: - the ‘de-Neolithisation’ of South Scandinavia

48 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In South Scandinavia, the Funnel Beaker culture is synonymous with the emergence of Neolithic societies (c 4000 BC), the construction of megalithic monuments and agricultural lifestyle. After c 1300 years of existence the Funnel Beaker culture ceased and a culturally blurred period began.
In the south-western parts of the Jutland Peninsula, the Single Grave culture emerged (c 2850 BC) expressing a high degree of cultural uniformity. In Eastern Denmark this uniformity was absent and instead the material culture shows a mixture of late Funnel Beaker, Pitted Ware and Single Grave culture elements. The question is whether the end of the Funnel Beaker culture in Eastern Denmark marks a period of decline and fragmentation or one of continuity and incorporation of new cultural elements and subsistence strategies. In particular the revival of hunter-fisher-gatherer strategies applied by the Pitted Ware culture represents a different economic focus than that held by the Funnel Beaker culture. The renewed focus on hunter-fisher-gatherer strategies, 1000 years after the introduction of agriculture, challenges the prevalent understanding of the dynamics behind the Neolithisation.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNW Europe in Transition : The Early Neolithic in Britain and South Sweden
EditorsMats Larsson, Jolene Debert
Number of pages7
Volume2475
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherArchaeopress
Publication date2013
Pages21-27
Chapter3
ISBN (Print)978 1 4073 1087 9
Publication statusPublished - 2013
SeriesB A R. International Series
ISSN0143-3067

Keywords

  • Faculty of Humanities
  • ‘de-Neolithisation’
  • Neolithic lifestyle
  • mobile strategies
  • megalithic tombs
  • TRB
  • Single Grave culture
  • Pitted Ware culture
  • South Scandinavia
  • third millennium BC

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond the Neolithic transition: - the ‘de-Neolithisation’ of South Scandinavia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this