Abstract
This article provides a reply to the other contributions to this special section of Security Dialogue on The Evolution of International Security Studies. Our response cuts across the special section as a whole, focusing on the following questions: What does it mean to take a critical stance towards the history of international security studies? Does micro-sociology provide the way forward? How do the main analytical distinctions laid out in The Evolution of International Security Studies work? And, what are the challenges and suggestions for a more thorough study of traditionalism?.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Security Dialogue |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Pages (from-to) | 659-667 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| ISSN | 0967-0106 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2010 |