Bayesian estimation of true between-herd and within-herd prevalence of Salmonella in Danish veal calves

Torben Dahl Nielsen; Liza Rosenbaum Nielsen; Nils Toft

doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.02.014

Bayesian estimation of true between-herd and within-herd prevalence of Salmonella in Danish veal calves

Torben Dahl Nielsen, Liza Rosenbaum Nielsen, Nils Toft

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Specialised veal producers that purchase and raise calves from several dairy herds are
potentially at high risk of delivering Salmonella-infected animals to slaughter. However, the true prevalence of Salmonella infected veal producing herds and the prevalence of infected calves delivered to slaughter from infected herds are unknown in Denmark. Due to uncertainties about test sensitivity and specificity, these prevalences are not straightforward to assess. The objective of this study was to estimate the within-herd- and between-herd prevalence of Salmonella in veal calves delivered for slaughter to abattoirs in Denmark. Furthermore, it was investigated to which extent the estimates differed between a setup using both serological tests and faecal culture, compared to just serological tests, and whether the applied sampling scheme in the national surveillance programme in Denmark was sufficient to establish high posterior estimates of freedom from infection in individual herds.
We used Bayesian analysis to avoid bias as a result of fixed test validity estimates. Serological test results from 753 animals and faecal culture from 1233 animals from 68 randomly selected Danish veal producing herds that delivered more than 100 calves to slaughter per year were used to estimate the prevalences and estimates of freedom from Salmonella. Serological test results of 7726 animals from 185 herds were used to compare the difference in prevalence estimates between serology alone vs. faecal culture combined with serology. We estimated that 34–57% of specialised veal producing herds were infected with Salmonella.
Within the infected herds, 21–49% of the animals were infected. Few herds obtained high posterior estimates for the probability of freedom from infection given the collected data, with only six of 68 herds obtaining posterior probability of being infected less than 10%.
Furthermore, this study indicated that serology is sufficiently sensitive and specific to be
used for estimating the prevalence of Salmonella-infected specialised veal producing herds.

Original language	English
Journal	Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Volume	100
Issue number	3-4
Pages (from-to)	155–162
Number of pages	8
ISSN	0167-5877
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.02.014
Publication status	Published - 1 Jul 2011

Keywords

Former LIFE faculty

Access to Document

10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.02.014

Cite this

@article{390aabd47ac0421b9536ad3b17df1546,

title = "Bayesian estimation of true between-herd and within-herd prevalence of Salmonella in Danish veal calves",

abstract = "Specialised veal producers that purchase and raise calves from several dairy herds are potentially at high risk of delivering Salmonella-infected animals to slaughter. However, the true prevalence of Salmonella infected veal producing herds and the prevalence of infected calves delivered to slaughter from infected herds are unknown in Denmark. Due to uncertainties about test sensitivity and specificity, these prevalences are not straightforward to assess. The objective of this study was to estimate the within-herd- and between-herd prevalence of Salmonella in veal calves delivered for slaughter to abattoirs in Denmark. Furthermore, it was investigated to which extent the estimates differed between a setup using both serological tests and faecal culture, compared to just serological tests, and whether the applied sampling scheme in the national surveillance programme in Denmark was sufficient to establish high posterior estimates of freedom from infection in individual herds. We used Bayesian analysis to avoid bias as a result of fixed test validity estimates. Serological test results from 753 animals and faecal culture from 1233 animals from 68 randomly selected Danish veal producing herds that delivered more than 100 calves to slaughter per year were used to estimate the prevalences and estimates of freedom from Salmonella. Serological test results of 7726 animals from 185 herds were used to compare the difference in prevalence estimates between serology alone vs. faecal culture combined with serology. We estimated that 34–57% of specialised veal producing herds were infected with Salmonella. Within the infected herds, 21–49% of the animals were infected. Few herds obtained high posterior estimates for the probability of freedom from infection given the collected data, with only six of 68 herds obtaining posterior probability of being infected less than 10%. Furthermore, this study indicated that serology is sufficiently sensitive and specific to be used for estimating the prevalence of Salmonella-infected specialised veal producing herds.",

keywords = "Former LIFE faculty, Veterin{\ae}r epidemiologi, Salmonella Dublin, cattle",

author = "Nielsen, {Torben Dahl} and Nielsen, {Liza Rosenbaum} and Nils Toft",

year = "2011",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.02.014",

language = "English",

volume = "100",

pages = "155–162",

journal = "Preventive Veterinary Medicine",

issn = "0167-5877",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bayesian estimation of true between-herd and within-herd prevalence of Salmonella in Danish veal calves

AU - Nielsen, Torben Dahl

AU - Nielsen, Liza Rosenbaum

AU - Toft, Nils

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - Specialised veal producers that purchase and raise calves from several dairy herds are potentially at high risk of delivering Salmonella-infected animals to slaughter. However, the true prevalence of Salmonella infected veal producing herds and the prevalence of infected calves delivered to slaughter from infected herds are unknown in Denmark. Due to uncertainties about test sensitivity and specificity, these prevalences are not straightforward to assess. The objective of this study was to estimate the within-herd- and between-herd prevalence of Salmonella in veal calves delivered for slaughter to abattoirs in Denmark. Furthermore, it was investigated to which extent the estimates differed between a setup using both serological tests and faecal culture, compared to just serological tests, and whether the applied sampling scheme in the national surveillance programme in Denmark was sufficient to establish high posterior estimates of freedom from infection in individual herds. We used Bayesian analysis to avoid bias as a result of fixed test validity estimates. Serological test results from 753 animals and faecal culture from 1233 animals from 68 randomly selected Danish veal producing herds that delivered more than 100 calves to slaughter per year were used to estimate the prevalences and estimates of freedom from Salmonella. Serological test results of 7726 animals from 185 herds were used to compare the difference in prevalence estimates between serology alone vs. faecal culture combined with serology. We estimated that 34–57% of specialised veal producing herds were infected with Salmonella. Within the infected herds, 21–49% of the animals were infected. Few herds obtained high posterior estimates for the probability of freedom from infection given the collected data, with only six of 68 herds obtaining posterior probability of being infected less than 10%. Furthermore, this study indicated that serology is sufficiently sensitive and specific to be used for estimating the prevalence of Salmonella-infected specialised veal producing herds.

AB - Specialised veal producers that purchase and raise calves from several dairy herds are potentially at high risk of delivering Salmonella-infected animals to slaughter. However, the true prevalence of Salmonella infected veal producing herds and the prevalence of infected calves delivered to slaughter from infected herds are unknown in Denmark. Due to uncertainties about test sensitivity and specificity, these prevalences are not straightforward to assess. The objective of this study was to estimate the within-herd- and between-herd prevalence of Salmonella in veal calves delivered for slaughter to abattoirs in Denmark. Furthermore, it was investigated to which extent the estimates differed between a setup using both serological tests and faecal culture, compared to just serological tests, and whether the applied sampling scheme in the national surveillance programme in Denmark was sufficient to establish high posterior estimates of freedom from infection in individual herds. We used Bayesian analysis to avoid bias as a result of fixed test validity estimates. Serological test results from 753 animals and faecal culture from 1233 animals from 68 randomly selected Danish veal producing herds that delivered more than 100 calves to slaughter per year were used to estimate the prevalences and estimates of freedom from Salmonella. Serological test results of 7726 animals from 185 herds were used to compare the difference in prevalence estimates between serology alone vs. faecal culture combined with serology. We estimated that 34–57% of specialised veal producing herds were infected with Salmonella. Within the infected herds, 21–49% of the animals were infected. Few herds obtained high posterior estimates for the probability of freedom from infection given the collected data, with only six of 68 herds obtaining posterior probability of being infected less than 10%. Furthermore, this study indicated that serology is sufficiently sensitive and specific to be used for estimating the prevalence of Salmonella-infected specialised veal producing herds.

KW - Former LIFE faculty

KW - Veterinær epidemiologi

KW - Salmonella Dublin

KW - cattle

U2 - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.02.014

DO - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.02.014

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0167-5877

VL - 100

SP - 155

EP - 162

JO - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

JF - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

IS - 3-4

ER -