Arrested development – Given ongoing challenges in sample preparation and lack of novel alternatives, is it time to give liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) a second chance?

Astrid Gjelstad; Knut Einar Rasmussen; Stig Pedersen-Bjergaard

Arrested development – Given ongoing challenges in sample preparation and lack of novel alternatives, is it time to give liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) a second chance?

Astrid Gjelstad, Knut Einar Rasmussen, Stig Pedersen-Bjergaard

Original language	English
Article number	601
Journal	The Analytical Scientist
Issue number	2
Pages (from-to)	46-49
Number of pages	4
ISSN	2051-4077
Publication status	Published - 2017

Access to Document

https://theanalyticalscientist.com/issues/0217/arrested-development/

Cite this

Arrested development – Given ongoing challenges in sample preparation and lack of novel alternatives, is it time to give liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) a second chance? / Gjelstad, Astrid; Rasmussen, Knut Einar; Pedersen-Bjergaard, Stig.

In: The Analytical Scientist, No. 2, 601, 2017, p. 46-49.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Communication

@article{e02a85d6644e4f57bc99ff9c90d35463,

title = "Arrested development – Given ongoing challenges in sample preparation and lack of novel alternatives, is it time to give liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) a second chance?",

author = "Astrid Gjelstad and Rasmussen, {Knut Einar} and Stig Pedersen-Bjergaard",

year = "2017",

language = "English",

pages = "46--49",

journal = "The Analytical Scientist",

issn = "2051-4077",