TY - JOUR
T1 - Ancient nuclear genomes enable repatriation of Indigenous human remains
AU - Wright, Joanne L.
AU - Wasef, Sally
AU - Heupink, Tim H.
AU - Westaway, Michael C.
AU - Rasmussen, Simon
AU - Pardoe, Colin
AU - Fourmile, Gudju Gudju
AU - Young, Michael
AU - Johnson, Trish
AU - Slade, Joan
AU - Kennedy, Roy
AU - Winch, Patsy
AU - Pappin, Mary
AU - Wales, Tapij
AU - Bates, William “badger”
AU - Hamilton, Sharnie
AU - Whyman, Neville
AU - Van Holst Pellekaan, Sheila
AU - Mcallister, Peter J.
AU - Taçon, Paul S.c.
AU - Curnoe, Darren
AU - Li, Ruiqiang
AU - Millar, Craig
AU - Subramanian, Sankar
AU - Willerslev, Eske
AU - Malaspinas, Anna-sapfo
AU - Sikora, Martin
AU - Lambert, David M.
PY - 2018/12/19
Y1 - 2018/12/19
N2 - After European colonization, the ancestral remains of Indigenous people were often collected for scientific research or display in museum collections. For many decades, Indigenous people, including Native Americans and Aboriginal Australians, have fought for their return. However, many of these remains have no recorded provenance, making their repatriation very difficult or impossible. To determine whether DNA-based methods could resolve this important problem, we sequenced 10 nuclear genomes and 27 mitogenomes from ancient pre-European Aboriginal Australians (up to 1540 years before the present) of known provenance and compared them to 100 high-coverage contemporary Aboriginal Australian genomes, also of known provenance. We report substantial ancient population structure showing strong genetic affinities between ancient and contemporary Aboriginal Australian individuals from the same geographic location. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of successfully identifying the origins of unprovenanced ancestral remains using genomic methods.
AB - After European colonization, the ancestral remains of Indigenous people were often collected for scientific research or display in museum collections. For many decades, Indigenous people, including Native Americans and Aboriginal Australians, have fought for their return. However, many of these remains have no recorded provenance, making their repatriation very difficult or impossible. To determine whether DNA-based methods could resolve this important problem, we sequenced 10 nuclear genomes and 27 mitogenomes from ancient pre-European Aboriginal Australians (up to 1540 years before the present) of known provenance and compared them to 100 high-coverage contemporary Aboriginal Australian genomes, also of known provenance. We report substantial ancient population structure showing strong genetic affinities between ancient and contemporary Aboriginal Australian individuals from the same geographic location. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of successfully identifying the origins of unprovenanced ancestral remains using genomic methods.
U2 - 10.1126/sciadv.aau5064
DO - 10.1126/sciadv.aau5064
M3 - Journal article
SN - 2375-2548
VL - 4
JO - Science Advances
JF - Science Advances
IS - 12
M1 - eaau5064
ER -