TY - JOUR
T1 - Almost half of the Danish general practitioners have negative a priori attitudes towards a mandatory accreditation programme
AU - Waldorff, Frans Boch
AU - Nicolaisdottir, Dagny Ros
AU - Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm
AU - Reventlow, Susanne
AU - Søndergaard, Jens
AU - Thorsen, Thorkil
AU - Andersen, Merethe Kirstine
AU - Pedersen, Line Bjørnskov
AU - Bisgaard, Louise
AU - Hutters, Cecilie Lybeck
AU - Bro, Flemming
N1 - PMID: 27585527
PY - 2016/9
Y1 - 2016/9
N2 - INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to analyse Danish general practitioners’ (GPs) a priori attitudes and expectations towards a nationwide mandatory accreditation programme. METHODS: This study is based on a nationwide electronic survey comprising all Danish GPs (n = 3,403). RESULTS: A total of 1,906 (56%) GPs completed the questionnaire. In all, 861 (45%) had a negative attitude towards accreditation, whereas 429 (21%) were very positive or positive. The negative attitudes towards accreditation were associated with being older, male and with working in a singlehanded practice. A regional difference was observed as well. GPs with negative expectations were more likely to agree that accreditation was a tool meant for external control (odds ratio (OR) = 1.87 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-2.95)), less likely to agree that accreditation was a tool for quality improvement (OR = 0.018 (95% CI: 0.013-0.025)), more likely to agree that it would affect job satisfaction negatively (OR = 21.88 (95% CI: 16.10-29.72)), and they were generally less satisfied with their present job situation (OR = 2.51 (95% CI: 1.85-3.41)). CONCLUSION: Almost half of the GPs had negative attitudes towards accreditation.
AB - INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to analyse Danish general practitioners’ (GPs) a priori attitudes and expectations towards a nationwide mandatory accreditation programme. METHODS: This study is based on a nationwide electronic survey comprising all Danish GPs (n = 3,403). RESULTS: A total of 1,906 (56%) GPs completed the questionnaire. In all, 861 (45%) had a negative attitude towards accreditation, whereas 429 (21%) were very positive or positive. The negative attitudes towards accreditation were associated with being older, male and with working in a singlehanded practice. A regional difference was observed as well. GPs with negative expectations were more likely to agree that accreditation was a tool meant for external control (odds ratio (OR) = 1.87 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-2.95)), less likely to agree that accreditation was a tool for quality improvement (OR = 0.018 (95% CI: 0.013-0.025)), more likely to agree that it would affect job satisfaction negatively (OR = 21.88 (95% CI: 16.10-29.72)), and they were generally less satisfied with their present job situation (OR = 2.51 (95% CI: 1.85-3.41)). CONCLUSION: Almost half of the GPs had negative attitudes towards accreditation.
KW - Journal Article
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 27585527
SN - 2245-1919
VL - 63
SP - 1
EP - 5
JO - Danish Medical Journal
JF - Danish Medical Journal
IS - 9
M1 - A5266
ER -