Almost half of the Danish general practitioners have negative a priori attitudes towards a mandatory accreditation programme

Frans Boch Waldorff, Dagny Ros Nicolaisdottir, Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard, Susanne Reventlow, Jens Søndergaard, Thorkil Thorsen, Merethe Kirstine Andersen, Line Bjørnskov Pedersen, Louise Bisgaard, Cecilie Lybeck Hutters, Flemming Bro

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to analyse Danish general practitioners’ (GPs) a priori attitudes and expectations towards a nationwide mandatory accreditation programme. METHODS: This study is based on a nationwide electronic survey comprising all Danish GPs (n = 3,403). RESULTS: A total of 1,906 (56%) GPs completed the questionnaire. In all, 861 (45%) had a negative attitude towards accreditation, whereas 429 (21%) were very positive or positive. The negative attitudes towards accreditation were associated with being older, male and with working in a singlehanded practice. A regional difference was observed as well. GPs with negative expectations were more likely to agree that accreditation was a tool meant for external control (odds ratio (OR) = 1.87 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-2.95)), less likely to agree that accreditation was a tool for quality improvement (OR = 0.018 (95% CI: 0.013-0.025)), more likely to agree that it would affect job satisfaction negatively (OR = 21.88 (95% CI: 16.10-29.72)), and they were generally less satisfied with their present job situation (OR = 2.51 (95% CI: 1.85-3.41)). CONCLUSION: Almost half of the GPs had negative attitudes towards accreditation.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberA5266
JournalDanish Medical Journal
Volume63
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
ISSN2245-1919
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2016

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Almost half of the Danish general practitioners have negative a priori attitudes towards a mandatory accreditation programme'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this