Ad hoc method for the assessment on listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law

Simon J. More; Anette Bøtner; Andrew Butterworth; Paolo Calistri; Klaus Depner; Sandra Edwards; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Margaret Good; Christian  Gortazar Schmidt; Virginie Michel; Miguel Angel Miranda; Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Mohan Raj; Liisa Sihvonen; Arjan Stegeman; Hans-Hermann Thulke; Antonio Velarde; Preben Willeberg; Christoph Winckler; Francesca Baldinelli; Alessandro Broglia; Denise Candiani; Andrea Gervelmeyer; Gabriele Zancanaro; Lisa Kohnle; Joana Morgado; Dominique Bicout

doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4783

Ad hoc method for the assessment on listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law

Simon J. More, Anette Bøtner, Andrew Butterworth, Paolo Calistri, Klaus Depner, Sandra Edwards, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, Margaret Good, Christian Gortazar Schmidt, Virginie Michel, Miguel Angel Miranda, Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Mohan Raj, Liisa Sihvonen, Arjan Stegeman, Hans-Hermann Thulke, Antonio Velarde, Preben Willeberg, Christoph Winckler, Francesca BaldinelliAlessandro Broglia, Denise Candiani, Andrea Gervelmeyer, Gabriele Zancanaro, Lisa Kohnle, Joana Morgado, Dominique Bicout

15 Citations (Scopus)

54 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The European Commission has requested EFSA to assess animal diseases according to the criteria as laid down in Articles 5, 7, 8 and Annex IV for the purpose of categorisation of diseases in accordance with Article 9 of the Regulation (EU) No 2016/429 (Animal Health Law). This scientific opinion addresses the ad hoc method developed for assessing any animal disease for the listing and categorisation of diseases within the Animal Health Law (AHL) framework. The assessment of individual diseases is addressed in distinct scientific opinions that are published separately. The assessment of Articles 5, 8 and 9 criteria is performed on the basis of the information collected according to Article 7 criteria. For that purpose, Article 7 criteria were structured into parameters and the information was collected at parameter level. The resulting fact sheets on the profile and impact of each disease were compiled by disease scientists. A mapping was developed to identify which parameters from Article 7 were needed to inform each Article 5, 8 and 9 criterion. Specifically, for Articles 5 and 9 criteria, a categorical assessment was performed, by applying an expert judgement procedure, based on the mapped information. The judgement was performed by EFSA Panel experts on Animal Health and Welfare in two rounds, individual and collective judgement. The output of the expert judgement on the criteria of Articles 5 and 9 for each disease is composed by the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported.

Original language	English
Article number	e04783
Journal	E F S A Journal
Volume	15
Issue number	7
Number of pages	42
ISSN	1831-4732
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4783
Publication status	Published - 1 Jul 2017

Access to Document

10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4783Licence: CC BY-ND

Ad hoc method for the assessment on listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health LawFinal published version, 2.23 MBLicence: CC BY-ND

Cite this

More, S. J., Bøtner, A., Butterworth, A., Calistri, P., Depner, K., Edwards, S., Garin-Bastuji, B., Good, M., Gortazar Schmidt, C., Michel, V., Miranda, M. A., Nielsen, S. S., Raj, M., Sihvonen, L., Stegeman, A., Thulke, H-H., Velarde, A., Willeberg, P., Winckler, C., ... Bicout, D. (2017). Ad hoc method for the assessment on listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law. E F S A Journal, 15(7), [e04783]. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4783

More, SJ, Bøtner, A, Butterworth, A, Calistri, P, Depner, K, Edwards, S, Garin-Bastuji, B, Good, M, Gortazar Schmidt, C, Michel, V, Miranda, MA, Nielsen, SS, Raj, M, Sihvonen, L, Stegeman, A, Thulke, H-H, Velarde, A, Willeberg, P, Winckler, C, Baldinelli, F, Broglia, A, Candiani, D, Gervelmeyer, A, Zancanaro, G, Kohnle, L, Morgado, J & Bicout, D 2017, 'Ad hoc method for the assessment on listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law', E F S A Journal, vol. 15, no. 7, e04783. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4783

@article{aa0edd953e744946bcab2efade7eb1d3,

title = "Ad hoc method for the assessment on listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law",

abstract = "The European Commission has requested EFSA to assess animal diseases according to the criteria as laid down in Articles 5, 7, 8 and Annex IV for the purpose of categorisation of diseases in accordance with Article 9 of the Regulation (EU) No 2016/429 (Animal Health Law). This scientific opinion addresses the ad hoc method developed for assessing any animal disease for the listing and categorisation of diseases within the Animal Health Law (AHL) framework. The assessment of individual diseases is addressed in distinct scientific opinions that are published separately. The assessment of Articles 5, 8 and 9 criteria is performed on the basis of the information collected according to Article 7 criteria. For that purpose, Article 7 criteria were structured into parameters and the information was collected at parameter level. The resulting fact sheets on the profile and impact of each disease were compiled by disease scientists. A mapping was developed to identify which parameters from Article 7 were needed to inform each Article 5, 8 and 9 criterion. Specifically, for Articles 5 and 9 criteria, a categorical assessment was performed, by applying an expert judgement procedure, based on the mapped information. The judgement was performed by EFSA Panel experts on Animal Health and Welfare in two rounds, individual and collective judgement. The output of the expert judgement on the criteria of Articles 5 and 9 for each disease is composed by the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported.",

author = "More, {Simon J.} and Anette B{\o}tner and Andrew Butterworth and Paolo Calistri and Klaus Depner and Sandra Edwards and Bruno Garin-Bastuji and Margaret Good and {Gortazar Schmidt}, Christian and Virginie Michel and Miranda, {Miguel Angel} and Nielsen, {S{\o}ren Saxmose} and Mohan Raj and Liisa Sihvonen and Arjan Stegeman and Hans-Hermann Thulke and Antonio Velarde and Preben Willeberg and Christoph Winckler and Francesca Baldinelli and Alessandro Broglia and Denise Candiani and Andrea Gervelmeyer and Gabriele Zancanaro and Lisa Kohnle and Joana Morgado and Dominique Bicout",

year = "2017",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4783",

language = "English",

volume = "15",

journal = "E F S A Journal",

issn = "1831-4732",

publisher = "European Food Safety Authority (E F S A)",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ad hoc method for the assessment on listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law

AU - More, Simon J.

AU - Bøtner, Anette

AU - Butterworth, Andrew

AU - Calistri, Paolo

AU - Depner, Klaus

AU - Edwards, Sandra

AU - Garin-Bastuji, Bruno

AU - Good, Margaret

AU - Gortazar Schmidt, Christian

AU - Michel, Virginie

AU - Miranda, Miguel Angel

AU - Nielsen, Søren Saxmose

AU - Raj, Mohan

AU - Sihvonen, Liisa

AU - Stegeman, Arjan

AU - Thulke, Hans-Hermann

AU - Velarde, Antonio

AU - Willeberg, Preben

AU - Winckler, Christoph

AU - Baldinelli, Francesca

AU - Broglia, Alessandro

AU - Candiani, Denise

AU - Gervelmeyer, Andrea

AU - Zancanaro, Gabriele

AU - Kohnle, Lisa

AU - Morgado, Joana

AU - Bicout, Dominique

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - The European Commission has requested EFSA to assess animal diseases according to the criteria as laid down in Articles 5, 7, 8 and Annex IV for the purpose of categorisation of diseases in accordance with Article 9 of the Regulation (EU) No 2016/429 (Animal Health Law). This scientific opinion addresses the ad hoc method developed for assessing any animal disease for the listing and categorisation of diseases within the Animal Health Law (AHL) framework. The assessment of individual diseases is addressed in distinct scientific opinions that are published separately. The assessment of Articles 5, 8 and 9 criteria is performed on the basis of the information collected according to Article 7 criteria. For that purpose, Article 7 criteria were structured into parameters and the information was collected at parameter level. The resulting fact sheets on the profile and impact of each disease were compiled by disease scientists. A mapping was developed to identify which parameters from Article 7 were needed to inform each Article 5, 8 and 9 criterion. Specifically, for Articles 5 and 9 criteria, a categorical assessment was performed, by applying an expert judgement procedure, based on the mapped information. The judgement was performed by EFSA Panel experts on Animal Health and Welfare in two rounds, individual and collective judgement. The output of the expert judgement on the criteria of Articles 5 and 9 for each disease is composed by the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported.

AB - The European Commission has requested EFSA to assess animal diseases according to the criteria as laid down in Articles 5, 7, 8 and Annex IV for the purpose of categorisation of diseases in accordance with Article 9 of the Regulation (EU) No 2016/429 (Animal Health Law). This scientific opinion addresses the ad hoc method developed for assessing any animal disease for the listing and categorisation of diseases within the Animal Health Law (AHL) framework. The assessment of individual diseases is addressed in distinct scientific opinions that are published separately. The assessment of Articles 5, 8 and 9 criteria is performed on the basis of the information collected according to Article 7 criteria. For that purpose, Article 7 criteria were structured into parameters and the information was collected at parameter level. The resulting fact sheets on the profile and impact of each disease were compiled by disease scientists. A mapping was developed to identify which parameters from Article 7 were needed to inform each Article 5, 8 and 9 criterion. Specifically, for Articles 5 and 9 criteria, a categorical assessment was performed, by applying an expert judgement procedure, based on the mapped information. The judgement was performed by EFSA Panel experts on Animal Health and Welfare in two rounds, individual and collective judgement. The output of the expert judgement on the criteria of Articles 5 and 9 for each disease is composed by the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported.

U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4783

DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4783

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1831-4732

VL - 15

JO - E F S A Journal

JF - E F S A Journal

IS - 7

M1 - e04783

ER -

Ad hoc method for the assessment on listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this