Accounting for Fetal Origins: Health Capital vs. Health Deficits

    Abstract

    The Fetal Origins hypothesis has received considerable empirical support, both within epidemiology and economics. The present study compares the ability of two rival theoretical frameworks in accounting for the kind of path dependence implied by the Fetal Origins Hypothesis. We argue that while the health capital model due to Grossman (Journal of Political Economy, 80(2), 223-255, 1972) is irreconcilable with Fetal Origins of late-in-life health outcomes, the more recent health deficit model due to Dalgaard and Strulik (Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(3), 672-701, 2014) can generate shock amplification consistent with the hypothesis.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages18
    Publication statusPublished - 2017
    SeriesUniversity of Copenhagen. Institute of Economics. Discussion Papers (Online)
    Number17-11
    ISSN1601-2461

    Keywords

    • Faculty of Social Sciences
    • Fetal Origins
    • Health Capital
    • Health Deficits

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting for Fetal Origins: Health Capital vs. Health Deficits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this