A systematic review of concept mapping-based formative assessment processes in primary and secondary science education

Rikke Hartmeyer*, Matt Peter Stevenson, Peter Bentsen

*Corresponding author for this work
3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we present and discuss the results of a systematic review of concept mapping-based interventions in primary and secondary science education. We identified the following recommendations for science educators on how to successfully apply concept mapping as a method for formative assessment: firstly, concept mapping should be constructed in teaching, preferably on repeated occasions. Secondly, concept mapping should be carried out individually if personal understanding is to be elicited; however, collaborative concept mapping might foster discussions valuable for developing students’ understanding and for activating them as instructional resources and owners of their own learning. Thirdly, low-directed mapping seems most suitable for formative assessment. Fourthly, technology-based or peer assessments are useful strategies likely to reduce the load of interpretation for the educator and are compatible with timely feedback. Finally, elaboration should be part of the feedback, activating students as the owners of their own learning.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAssessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice
Volume25
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)598-619
Number of pages22
ISSN0969-594X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2018

Keywords

  • Evaluation
  • feedback
  • node–link diagrams
  • science teaching

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review of concept mapping-based formative assessment processes in primary and secondary science education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this