A review of the methods for neuronal response latency estimation

Marie  Levakovaa; Massimiliano Tamborrino; Susanne Ditlevsen; Petr Lansky

doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.04.008

A review of the methods for neuronal response latency estimation

Marie Levakovaa, Massimiliano Tamborrino, Susanne Ditlevsen, Petr Lansky

Department of Mathematical Sciences

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Neuronal response latency is usually vaguely defined as the delay between the stimulus onset and the beginning of the response. It contains important information for the understanding of the temporal code. For this reason, the detection of the response latency has been extensively studied in the last twenty years, yielding different estimation methods. They can be divided into two classes, one of them including methods based on detecting an intensity change in the firing rate profile after the stimulus onset and the other containing methods based on detection of spikes evoked by the stimulation using interspike intervals and spike times. The aim of this paper is to present a review of the main techniques proposed in both classes, highlighting their advantages and shortcomings.

Original language	English
Journal	BioSystems
Volume	136
Pages (from-to)	23-34
ISSN	0303-2647
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.04.008
Publication status	Published - 1 Oct 2015

Access to Document

10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.04.008

Cite this

@article{3614c753245d475f88b1075eaf867e36,

title = "A review of the methods for neuronal response latency estimation",

abstract = "Neuronal response latency is usually vaguely defined as the delay between the stimulus onset and the beginning of the response. It contains important information for the understanding of the temporal code. For this reason, the detection of the response latency has been extensively studied in the last twenty years, yielding different estimation methods. They can be divided into two classes, one of them including methods based on detecting an intensity change in the firing rate profile after the stimulus onset and the other containing methods based on detection of spikes evoked by the stimulation using interspike intervals and spike times. The aim of this paper is to present a review of the main techniques proposed in both classes, highlighting their advantages and shortcomings.",

author = "Marie Levakovaa and Massimiliano Tamborrino and Susanne Ditlevsen and Petr Lansky",

year = "2015",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.04.008",

language = "English",

volume = "136",

pages = "23--34",

journal = "BioSystems",

issn = "0303-2647",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of the methods for neuronal response latency estimation

AU - Levakovaa, Marie

AU - Tamborrino, Massimiliano

AU - Ditlevsen, Susanne

AU - Lansky, Petr

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Neuronal response latency is usually vaguely defined as the delay between the stimulus onset and the beginning of the response. It contains important information for the understanding of the temporal code. For this reason, the detection of the response latency has been extensively studied in the last twenty years, yielding different estimation methods. They can be divided into two classes, one of them including methods based on detecting an intensity change in the firing rate profile after the stimulus onset and the other containing methods based on detection of spikes evoked by the stimulation using interspike intervals and spike times. The aim of this paper is to present a review of the main techniques proposed in both classes, highlighting their advantages and shortcomings.

AB - Neuronal response latency is usually vaguely defined as the delay between the stimulus onset and the beginning of the response. It contains important information for the understanding of the temporal code. For this reason, the detection of the response latency has been extensively studied in the last twenty years, yielding different estimation methods. They can be divided into two classes, one of them including methods based on detecting an intensity change in the firing rate profile after the stimulus onset and the other containing methods based on detection of spikes evoked by the stimulation using interspike intervals and spike times. The aim of this paper is to present a review of the main techniques proposed in both classes, highlighting their advantages and shortcomings.

U2 - 10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.04.008

DO - 10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.04.008

M3 - Review

C2 - 25939679

SN - 0303-2647

VL - 136

SP - 23

EP - 34

JO - BioSystems

JF - BioSystems

ER -