A multireader reliability study comparing conventional high-field magnetic resonance imaging with extremity low-field MRI in rheumatoid arthritis.

Paul Bird, Bo Ejbjerg, Marissa Lassere, Mikkel Østergaard, Fiona McQueen, Charles Peterfy, Espen Haavardsholm, Philip O'Connor, Harry Genant, John Edmonds, Paul Emery, Philip G Conaghan

    31 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The use of extremity low-field magnetic resonance imaging (E-MRI) is increasing, but relatively few data exist on its reproducibility and accuracy in comparison with high-field MRI, especially for multiple readers. The aim of this multireader exercise of rheumatoid arthritis wrist and metacarpophalangeal joints was to assess the intermachine (high vs low-field) agreement and to assess the interreader agreement on high and low-field images. Study findings suggested that E-MRI performs similarly to conventional high-field MRI regarding assessment of bone erosions. However, for synovitis and bone edema, considerable intermachine and interreader variability was found. Further studies are needed before recommendations on multireader E-MRI assessment of these pathologies can be given.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Rheumatology
    Volume34
    Issue number4
    Pages (from-to)854-6
    Number of pages2
    ISSN0315-162X
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A multireader reliability study comparing conventional high-field magnetic resonance imaging with extremity low-field MRI in rheumatoid arthritis.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this