A Floridian dilemma. Semantic information and truth

    5 Citations (Scopus)
    6 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Introduction. Truth and falsity play a dominant role in contemporary work on information, misinformation, and disinformation. Discussions of these notions typically include remarks about their truth-values, or even explicit arguments in favour of their having fixed truth-values.
    Method. I use Chalmers’s framework for identifying and potentially solving verbal disputes to analyse the discussions regarding information and truth.
    Analysis. Philosophical analyses of the discussions of information and its relation to truth, as they play out between Luciano Floridi and Don Fallis (among others), are carried out in the paper.
    Results. I find that these discussions are in fact a verbal dispute. Further, the dominant focus on truth and falsity in the work on information, misinformation, and disinformation, within philosophy of information, gives rise to a Floridian dilemma: a dilemma in which Floridi’s definition of semantic information, as inherently truthful, turns out to encompass certain varieties of misinformation and disinformation while excluding others.
    Conclusion. I recommend that information must be defined as semantic content in general without reference to truth, i.e. as truth-neutral, such that all varieties of misinformation and disinformation can be kinds of information.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalInformation Research. An International Electronic Journal
    Volume24
    Issue number2
    ISSN1368-1613
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Floridian dilemma. Semantic information and truth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this