Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
University of Copenhagen Research Portal Home
Help & FAQ
Dansk
English
Home
Profiles
Research output
Research units
Press/Media
Activities
Prizes
???studenttheses???
Datasets
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
A comparison of microhardness of indirect composite restorative materials
Carolina Baptista Miranda, Clóvis Pagani, Marco Cícero Bottino,
Ana Raquel Benetti
Section 03 - Radiology
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of microhardness of indirect composite restorative materials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Engineering
Restorative Material
100%
Microhardness
100%
Indentation
33%
Multiple Comparison
16%
Polymerization Method
16%
Phase Composition
16%
Resin Composite
16%
Resin Composite Material
16%
Vickers
16%
Natural Teeth
16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Polytetrafluoroethylene
100%
Teeth
100%
Fungi
100%
Material Science
Microhardness
100%
Composite Material
100%
Vickers-Indentation
16%
Phase Composition
16%
Indentation
16%
Polymerization
16%
Keyphrases
Composite Restorative Materials
100%
Indirect Composite Resin
33%
Cylindrical Sample
16%
Variance Homogeneity
16%
Indentation Method
16%
Intermediate Material
16%
Vickers Indentation
16%
Chemistry
Microhardness
100%