Wound spread of radiolabeled saline with multi- versus few-hole catheters

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wound spread of radiolabeled saline with multi- versus few-hole catheters

AU - Andersen, Lasse Ø

AU - Kristensen, Billy B

AU - Madsen, Jan L

AU - Otte, Kristian S

AU - Husted, Henrik

AU - Kehlet, Henrik

AU - Otte, Niels Kristian Stahl

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Background and Objectives: Continuous wound infusion of local anesthetics is effective in postoperative pain management and may be useful in major joint arthroplasty, but the optimal technique for postoperative administration of local anesthetics in the wound awaits trials evaluating the optimal type of catheter (single-, few-, or multiholed catheters). Methods: Sixteen patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were randomized to intraoperative subfascial placement of a triple-orifice epidural catheter or a 15-cm multiholed catheter. Twenty milliliters of technetium Tc 99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-labeled saline was injected postoperatively and wound spread for 10 mins was recorded with a double-head gamma camera. Results: Mean (SD) wound spread (cm) was the same with administration through a multiholed catheter versus the epidural catheter in both anterior (89 [15] versus 82 [20], P = 0.4) and lateral (68 [19] versus 60 [11], P = 0.3) projections. Conclusions: Wound spread of a bolus injection through 15-cm multiholed catheters versus triple-orifice epidural catheters is similar with subfascial catheter placement in total hip arthroplasty. Procedure-specific trials are required to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of postoperative administration of local anesthetic in the wound with different types of catheter before general recommendations can be made.

AB - Background and Objectives: Continuous wound infusion of local anesthetics is effective in postoperative pain management and may be useful in major joint arthroplasty, but the optimal technique for postoperative administration of local anesthetics in the wound awaits trials evaluating the optimal type of catheter (single-, few-, or multiholed catheters). Methods: Sixteen patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were randomized to intraoperative subfascial placement of a triple-orifice epidural catheter or a 15-cm multiholed catheter. Twenty milliliters of technetium Tc 99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-labeled saline was injected postoperatively and wound spread for 10 mins was recorded with a double-head gamma camera. Results: Mean (SD) wound spread (cm) was the same with administration through a multiholed catheter versus the epidural catheter in both anterior (89 [15] versus 82 [20], P = 0.4) and lateral (68 [19] versus 60 [11], P = 0.3) projections. Conclusions: Wound spread of a bolus injection through 15-cm multiholed catheters versus triple-orifice epidural catheters is similar with subfascial catheter placement in total hip arthroplasty. Procedure-specific trials are required to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of postoperative administration of local anesthetic in the wound with different types of catheter before general recommendations can be made.

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1098-7339

VL - 35

SP - 200

EP - 202

JO - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

JF - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

IS - 2

ER -