Where and how can participatory forest management succeed?: learning from Tanzania, Mozambique, and Laos

Irmeli Hannele Mustalahti; Jens Friis Lund

doi:10.1080/08941920802213433

Where and how can participatory forest management succeed? learning from Tanzania, Mozambique, and Laos

Irmeli Hannele Mustalahti, Jens Friis Lund

48 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

This article deals with participatory forest management (PFM) in Tanzania, Mozambique, and Laos, focusing on the degree to which the legislation supports local communities' security of rights to the forest resources and access to resource benefits, as well as the degree to which the legislation is implemented. The findings are that local communities' security of rights and access to benefits differ markedly among the three countries, whereas there is a striking similarity in the absence of efforts to implement PFM, in particular in areas with valuable timber resources. The underlying reasons for the differences are poor institutional setups and conflicting economic interests at various levels. We argue that the approach to support PFM should acknowledge differences between countries and areas, and that, under all conditions, assistance to communities in building advocacy organizations that can assert their legal rights and demand commitment of national governments is a fundamental prerequisite for success.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Society and Natural Resources
Vol/bind	23
Udgave nummer	1
Sider (fra-til)	31-44
Antal sider	14
ISSN	0894-1920
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802213433
Status	Udgivet - jan. 2010

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1080/08941920802213433

Citationsformater

@article{fe78113ce79c474a8d7f54eb14a5b289,

title = "Where and how can participatory forest management succeed?: learning from Tanzania, Mozambique, and Laos",

abstract = "This article deals with participatory forest management (PFM) in Tanzania, Mozambique, and Laos, focusing on the degree to which the legislation supports local communities' security of rights to the forest resources and access to resource benefits, as well as the degree to which the legislation is implemented. The findings are that local communities' security of rights and access to benefits differ markedly among the three countries, whereas there is a striking similarity in the absence of efforts to implement PFM, in particular in areas with valuable timber resources. The underlying reasons for the differences are poor institutional setups and conflicting economic interests at various levels. We argue that the approach to support PFM should acknowledge differences between countries and areas, and that, under all conditions, assistance to communities in building advocacy organizations that can assert their legal rights and demand commitment of national governments is a fundamental prerequisite for success.",

author = "Mustalahti, {Irmeli Hannele} and Lund, {Jens Friis}",

year = "2010",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1080/08941920802213433",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "31--44",

journal = "Society and Natural Resources",

issn = "0894-1920",

publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Where and how can participatory forest management succeed?

T2 - learning from Tanzania, Mozambique, and Laos

AU - Mustalahti, Irmeli Hannele

AU - Lund, Jens Friis

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - This article deals with participatory forest management (PFM) in Tanzania, Mozambique, and Laos, focusing on the degree to which the legislation supports local communities' security of rights to the forest resources and access to resource benefits, as well as the degree to which the legislation is implemented. The findings are that local communities' security of rights and access to benefits differ markedly among the three countries, whereas there is a striking similarity in the absence of efforts to implement PFM, in particular in areas with valuable timber resources. The underlying reasons for the differences are poor institutional setups and conflicting economic interests at various levels. We argue that the approach to support PFM should acknowledge differences between countries and areas, and that, under all conditions, assistance to communities in building advocacy organizations that can assert their legal rights and demand commitment of national governments is a fundamental prerequisite for success.

AB - This article deals with participatory forest management (PFM) in Tanzania, Mozambique, and Laos, focusing on the degree to which the legislation supports local communities' security of rights to the forest resources and access to resource benefits, as well as the degree to which the legislation is implemented. The findings are that local communities' security of rights and access to benefits differ markedly among the three countries, whereas there is a striking similarity in the absence of efforts to implement PFM, in particular in areas with valuable timber resources. The underlying reasons for the differences are poor institutional setups and conflicting economic interests at various levels. We argue that the approach to support PFM should acknowledge differences between countries and areas, and that, under all conditions, assistance to communities in building advocacy organizations that can assert their legal rights and demand commitment of national governments is a fundamental prerequisite for success.

U2 - 10.1080/08941920802213433

DO - 10.1080/08941920802213433

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0894-1920

VL - 23

SP - 31

EP - 44

JO - Society and Natural Resources

JF - Society and Natural Resources

IS - 1

ER -

Where and how can participatory forest management succeed? learning from Tanzania, Mozambique, and Laos

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater