Visual Short-Term Memory: Is Capacity Dependent on Complexity or Familiarity?

TY - CONF

T1 - Visual Short-Term Memory: Is Capacity Dependent on Complexity or Familiarity?

AU - Sørensen, Thomas Alrik

AU - Granlund, Rabia Line

AU - Wiechmann, Maria

AU - Vangkilde, Signe Allerup

AU - Kyllingsbæk, Søren

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Several recent studies have explored the nature and limits of visual short-term memory (VSTM) (e.g. Luck & Vogel, 1997). A general VSTM capacity limit of about 3 to 4 objects has been found, confirming results from earlier studies (e.g. Cattell, 1885; Sperling, 1960). However, Alvarez and Cavanagh (2004) have argued that the capacity of VSTM is dependent on visual complexity rather than the number of objects. Contrary to this, we hypothesise that VSTM capacity is dependent on familiarity rather than the visual complexity of the stored items. In two studies, we explored how familiarity influences the capacity of VSTM. 1) In children learning to read, we found an increase in VSTM capacity for letters, while the capacity for line drawings (Snodgrass & Vanderwart, 1980) remained unchanged. 2) In further investigations, we found that Japanese readers had a larger VSTM capacity for Japanese Kanji symbols than non-Japanese readers while the capacity for letters and pictures remained similar. Our results indicate that VSTM capacity for familiar items is larger irrespective of visual complexity.

AB - Several recent studies have explored the nature and limits of visual short-term memory (VSTM) (e.g. Luck & Vogel, 1997). A general VSTM capacity limit of about 3 to 4 objects has been found, confirming results from earlier studies (e.g. Cattell, 1885; Sperling, 1960). However, Alvarez and Cavanagh (2004) have argued that the capacity of VSTM is dependent on visual complexity rather than the number of objects. Contrary to this, we hypothesise that VSTM capacity is dependent on familiarity rather than the visual complexity of the stored items. In two studies, we explored how familiarity influences the capacity of VSTM. 1) In children learning to read, we found an increase in VSTM capacity for letters, while the capacity for line drawings (Snodgrass & Vanderwart, 1980) remained unchanged. 2) In further investigations, we found that Japanese readers had a larger VSTM capacity for Japanese Kanji symbols than non-Japanese readers while the capacity for letters and pictures remained similar. Our results indicate that VSTM capacity for familiar items is larger irrespective of visual complexity.

M3 - Poster

T2 - Perspectives on Memory and Cognition

Y2 - 8 June 2006 through 9 June 2006

ER -