Trans-local professional projects: Re-scaling the linked ecology of expert jurisdictions

Anders Blok; Maria Duclos Lindstrøm; Marie Leth Meilvang; Inge Kryger Pedersen

doi:10.1093/jpo/joy003

Trans-local professional projects: Re-scaling the linked ecology of expert jurisdictions

Anders Blok, Maria Duclos Lindstrøm, Marie Leth Meilvang, Inge Kryger Pedersen

Sociologisk Institut

11 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

While a transnational sociology of the professions has opened up, the question of how to conceptualize the trans-local arenas in which contemporary professional projects compete for expert jurisdiction, organizational change, and wider policy reform remains elusive. Three literatures, in particular, have made important contributions: neo-institutional approaches to the re-scaling of professional organizational fields; Bourdieusian approaches to inter- and transnational fields of expert power; and approaches deploying Andrew Abbott’s notion of linked ecologies in analyzing transnational expert politics. In reviewing these debates, this article makes the case that Abbott’s core topological notion of ‘ecology’—understood as differentiated and competitive arenas for professional claims- and alliance-making—has certain advantages when it comes to re-scaling and specifying the trans-local character of many contemporary professional projects. In particular, the article argues, this notion allows the analyst to view issues of spatialization and scale-making, and hence the making, linking, and boundary-drawing of specific expert jurisdictions, as themselves major issues of negotiation and struggle for contemporary professional groups. This conceptual and methodological argument is fleshed out in the article in relation to an on-going comparative research project on how professional groups in Denmark compete and cooperate for local organizational change in relation to border-transcending challenges of climate adaptation, lifestyle-related diseases, and economic innovation. By mapping the three case histories in terms of their patterns of local–transnational relations, the article ends by specifying some of the methodological challenges for a qualitative and comparative study aiming to capture emerging and variable modalities of trans-local professional projects.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Journal of Professions and Organization
Vol/bind	5
Udgave nummer	2
Sider (fra-til)	106-122
ISSN	2051-8803
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joy003
Status	Udgivet - 28 aug. 2018

Emneord

Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultet

FN’s Verdensmål

Dette resultat bidrager til følgende verdensmål

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1093/jpo/joy003

Citationsformater

@article{3f0fb958d1f246b98ee346d0a9dee7d9,

title = "Trans-local professional projects: Re-scaling the linked ecology of expert jurisdictions",

abstract = "While a transnational sociology of the professions has opened up, the question of how to conceptualize the trans-local arenas in which contemporary professional projects compete for expert jurisdiction, organizational change, and wider policy reform remains elusive. Three literatures, in particular, have made important contributions: neo-institutional approaches to the re-scaling of professional organizational fields; Bourdieusian approaches to inter- and transnational fields of expert power; and approaches deploying Andrew Abbott{\textquoteright}s notion of linked ecologies in analyzing transnational expert politics. In reviewing these debates, this article makes the case that Abbott{\textquoteright}s core topological notion of {\textquoteleft}ecology{\textquoteright}—understood as differentiated and competitive arenas for professional claims- and alliance-making—has certain advantages when it comes to re-scaling and specifying the trans-local character of many contemporary professional projects. In particular, the article argues, this notion allows the analyst to view issues of spatialization and scale-making, and hence the making, linking, and boundary-drawing of specific expert jurisdictions, as themselves major issues of negotiation and struggle for contemporary professional groups. This conceptual and methodological argument is fleshed out in the article in relation to an on-going comparative research project on how professional groups in Denmark compete and cooperate for local organizational change in relation to border-transcending challenges of climate adaptation, lifestyle-related diseases, and economic innovation. By mapping the three case histories in terms of their patterns of local–transnational relations, the article ends by specifying some of the methodological challenges for a qualitative and comparative study aiming to capture emerging and variable modalities of trans-local professional projects.",

keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, trans-local professional projects, linked ecologie, scales of organizing, climate adaptation, lifestyle-related disease, innovation management",

author = "Anders Blok and Lindstr{\o}m, {Maria Duclos} and Meilvang, {Marie Leth} and Pedersen, {Inge Kryger}",

year = "2018",

month = aug,

day = "28",

doi = "10.1093/jpo/joy003",

language = "English",

volume = "5",

pages = "106--122",

journal = "Journal of Professions and Organization",

issn = "2051-8803",

publisher = "Oxford Journals",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trans-local professional projects

T2 - Re-scaling the linked ecology of expert jurisdictions

AU - Blok, Anders

AU - Lindstrøm, Maria Duclos

AU - Meilvang, Marie Leth

AU - Pedersen, Inge Kryger

PY - 2018/8/28

Y1 - 2018/8/28

N2 - While a transnational sociology of the professions has opened up, the question of how to conceptualize the trans-local arenas in which contemporary professional projects compete for expert jurisdiction, organizational change, and wider policy reform remains elusive. Three literatures, in particular, have made important contributions: neo-institutional approaches to the re-scaling of professional organizational fields; Bourdieusian approaches to inter- and transnational fields of expert power; and approaches deploying Andrew Abbott’s notion of linked ecologies in analyzing transnational expert politics. In reviewing these debates, this article makes the case that Abbott’s core topological notion of ‘ecology’—understood as differentiated and competitive arenas for professional claims- and alliance-making—has certain advantages when it comes to re-scaling and specifying the trans-local character of many contemporary professional projects. In particular, the article argues, this notion allows the analyst to view issues of spatialization and scale-making, and hence the making, linking, and boundary-drawing of specific expert jurisdictions, as themselves major issues of negotiation and struggle for contemporary professional groups. This conceptual and methodological argument is fleshed out in the article in relation to an on-going comparative research project on how professional groups in Denmark compete and cooperate for local organizational change in relation to border-transcending challenges of climate adaptation, lifestyle-related diseases, and economic innovation. By mapping the three case histories in terms of their patterns of local–transnational relations, the article ends by specifying some of the methodological challenges for a qualitative and comparative study aiming to capture emerging and variable modalities of trans-local professional projects.

AB - While a transnational sociology of the professions has opened up, the question of how to conceptualize the trans-local arenas in which contemporary professional projects compete for expert jurisdiction, organizational change, and wider policy reform remains elusive. Three literatures, in particular, have made important contributions: neo-institutional approaches to the re-scaling of professional organizational fields; Bourdieusian approaches to inter- and transnational fields of expert power; and approaches deploying Andrew Abbott’s notion of linked ecologies in analyzing transnational expert politics. In reviewing these debates, this article makes the case that Abbott’s core topological notion of ‘ecology’—understood as differentiated and competitive arenas for professional claims- and alliance-making—has certain advantages when it comes to re-scaling and specifying the trans-local character of many contemporary professional projects. In particular, the article argues, this notion allows the analyst to view issues of spatialization and scale-making, and hence the making, linking, and boundary-drawing of specific expert jurisdictions, as themselves major issues of negotiation and struggle for contemporary professional groups. This conceptual and methodological argument is fleshed out in the article in relation to an on-going comparative research project on how professional groups in Denmark compete and cooperate for local organizational change in relation to border-transcending challenges of climate adaptation, lifestyle-related diseases, and economic innovation. By mapping the three case histories in terms of their patterns of local–transnational relations, the article ends by specifying some of the methodological challenges for a qualitative and comparative study aiming to capture emerging and variable modalities of trans-local professional projects.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - trans-local professional projects

KW - linked ecologie

KW - scales of organizing

KW - climate adaptation

KW - lifestyle-related disease

KW - innovation management

U2 - 10.1093/jpo/joy003

DO - 10.1093/jpo/joy003

M3 - Journal article

SN - 2051-8803

VL - 5

SP - 106

EP - 122

JO - Journal of Professions and Organization

JF - Journal of Professions and Organization

IS - 2

ER -

Trans-local professional projects: Re-scaling the linked ecology of expert jurisdictions

Abstract

Emneord

FN’s Verdensmål

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater