Towards a Figurational History of Leicester Sociology, 1954–1982

Lars Bo Kaspersen; Andreas Møller Mulvad

doi:10.1177/0038038516648550

Towards a Figurational History of Leicester Sociology, 1954–1982

Lars Bo Kaspersen^*, Andreas Møller Mulvad

^*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Institut for Statskundskab, institutledelse

1 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

This article applies Norbert Elias’s ‘processual-relational approach’ to an empirical case: the influential Leicester Department of Sociology between 1954 and 1982. Based on 42 qualitative interviews and extensive archival materials, we identify two phases: the early phase of cohesion is characterised by a strong sense of purpose and a growing influence on British sociology. The second phase is characterised by social and intellectual fragmentation. In explaining this reversal, we argue that a critical juncture of youth rebellion around 1968 provided the portents of an anti-authoritarian civilisational trend, which increasingly put strains on the established power nexus: the autocratic leadership model embodied by the department’s inspirational leader, Ilya Neustadt.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Sociology
Vol/bind	51
Udgave nummer	6
Sider (fra-til)	1186-1204
Antal sider	19
ISSN	0038-0385
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516648550
Status	Udgivet - 1 dec. 2017

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1177/0038038516648550

Citationsformater

@article{2b8265769f5a4586a4c6827bdb9a9d45,

title = "Towards a Figurational History of Leicester Sociology, 1954–1982",

abstract = "This article applies Norbert Elias{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}processual-relational approach{\textquoteright} to an empirical case: the influential Leicester Department of Sociology between 1954 and 1982. Based on 42 qualitative interviews and extensive archival materials, we identify two phases: the early phase of cohesion is characterised by a strong sense of purpose and a growing influence on British sociology. The second phase is characterised by social and intellectual fragmentation. In explaining this reversal, we argue that a critical juncture of youth rebellion around 1968 provided the portents of an anti-authoritarian civilisational trend, which increasingly put strains on the established power nexus: the autocratic leadership model embodied by the department{\textquoteright}s inspirational leader, Ilya Neustadt.",

keywords = "history of British Sociology, Ilya Neustadt, institutional change, Leicester Sociology, Norbert Elias, Paul Hirst, process sociology, relational sociology",

author = "Kaspersen, {Lars Bo} and Mulvad, {Andreas M{\o}ller}",

year = "2017",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/0038038516648550",

language = "English",

volume = "51",

pages = "1186--1204",

journal = "Sociology",

issn = "0038-0385",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a Figurational History of Leicester Sociology, 1954–1982

AU - Kaspersen, Lars Bo

AU - Mulvad, Andreas Møller

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - This article applies Norbert Elias’s ‘processual-relational approach’ to an empirical case: the influential Leicester Department of Sociology between 1954 and 1982. Based on 42 qualitative interviews and extensive archival materials, we identify two phases: the early phase of cohesion is characterised by a strong sense of purpose and a growing influence on British sociology. The second phase is characterised by social and intellectual fragmentation. In explaining this reversal, we argue that a critical juncture of youth rebellion around 1968 provided the portents of an anti-authoritarian civilisational trend, which increasingly put strains on the established power nexus: the autocratic leadership model embodied by the department’s inspirational leader, Ilya Neustadt.

AB - This article applies Norbert Elias’s ‘processual-relational approach’ to an empirical case: the influential Leicester Department of Sociology between 1954 and 1982. Based on 42 qualitative interviews and extensive archival materials, we identify two phases: the early phase of cohesion is characterised by a strong sense of purpose and a growing influence on British sociology. The second phase is characterised by social and intellectual fragmentation. In explaining this reversal, we argue that a critical juncture of youth rebellion around 1968 provided the portents of an anti-authoritarian civilisational trend, which increasingly put strains on the established power nexus: the autocratic leadership model embodied by the department’s inspirational leader, Ilya Neustadt.

KW - history of British Sociology

KW - Ilya Neustadt

KW - institutional change

KW - Leicester Sociology

KW - Norbert Elias

KW - Paul Hirst

KW - process sociology

KW - relational sociology

U2 - 10.1177/0038038516648550

DO - 10.1177/0038038516648550

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85037351576

SN - 0038-0385

VL - 51

SP - 1186

EP - 1204

JO - Sociology

JF - Sociology

IS - 6

ER -

Towards a Figurational History of Leicester Sociology, 1954–1982

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater