Tough and easy choices: testing the influence of utility difference on stated certainty-in-choice in choice experiments

Søren Bøye Olsen; Thomas Lundhede; Jette Bredahl Jacobsen; Bo Jellesmark Thorsen

doi:10.1007/s10640-010-9443-9

Tough and easy choices: testing the influence of utility difference on stated certainty-in-choice in choice experiments

Søren Bøye Olsen, Thomas Lundhede, Jette Bredahl Jacobsen, Bo Jellesmark Thorsen

29 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Respondents in Stated Preference studies may be uncertain about their preferences for the good presented to them. Inspired by Wang (J Environ Econ Manag 32:219–232, 1997) we hypothesize that respondents’ stated certainty in choice increases with the utility difference between the alternative chosen and the best alternative to that. We test this hypothesis using data from two independent Choice Experiments both focusing on nature values. In modelling respondents’ self-reported certainty in choice, we find evidence that the stated level of certainty increases significantly as utility difference in choice sets increases. In addition, stated certainty increases with income. Furthermore, there is some evidence that male respondents are inherently more certain in their choices than females, and a learning effect may increase stated certainty. We find evidence of this in the first study where the good is described in rather broad and generic terms, but not in the second study where a more specific description of the good is used.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Environmental and Resource Economics
Vol/bind	49
Udgave nummer	4
Sider (fra-til)	491-510
Antal sider	20
ISSN	0924-6460
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9443-9
Status	Udgivet - aug. 2011

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1007/s10640-010-9443-9

http://www.springerlink.com/content/e3m51254676j52vv

Citationsformater

@article{0cf182efa0024f5385a510bc85de059f,

title = "Tough and easy choices: testing the influence of utility difference on stated certainty-in-choice in choice experiments",

abstract = "Respondents in Stated Preference studies may be uncertain about their preferences for the good presented to them. Inspired by Wang (J Environ Econ Manag 32:219–232, 1997) we hypothesize that respondents{\textquoteright} stated certainty in choice increases with the utility difference between the alternative chosen and the best alternative to that. We test this hypothesis using data from two independent Choice Experiments both focusing on nature values. In modelling respondents{\textquoteright} self-reported certainty in choice, we find evidence that the stated level of certainty increases significantly as utility difference in choice sets increases. In addition, stated certainty increases with income. Furthermore, there is some evidence that male respondents are inherently more certain in their choices than females, and a learning effect may increase stated certainty. We find evidence of this in the first study where the good is described in rather broad and generic terms, but not in the second study where a more specific description of the good is used. ",

author = "Olsen, {S{\o}ren B{\o}ye} and Thomas Lundhede and Jacobsen, {Jette Bredahl} and Thorsen, {Bo Jellesmark}",

year = "2011",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1007/s10640-010-9443-9",

language = "English",

volume = "49",

pages = "491--510",

journal = "Environmental and Resource Economics",

issn = "0924-6460",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tough and easy choices

T2 - testing the influence of utility difference on stated certainty-in-choice in choice experiments

AU - Olsen, Søren Bøye

AU - Lundhede, Thomas

AU - Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl

AU - Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - Respondents in Stated Preference studies may be uncertain about their preferences for the good presented to them. Inspired by Wang (J Environ Econ Manag 32:219–232, 1997) we hypothesize that respondents’ stated certainty in choice increases with the utility difference between the alternative chosen and the best alternative to that. We test this hypothesis using data from two independent Choice Experiments both focusing on nature values. In modelling respondents’ self-reported certainty in choice, we find evidence that the stated level of certainty increases significantly as utility difference in choice sets increases. In addition, stated certainty increases with income. Furthermore, there is some evidence that male respondents are inherently more certain in their choices than females, and a learning effect may increase stated certainty. We find evidence of this in the first study where the good is described in rather broad and generic terms, but not in the second study where a more specific description of the good is used.

AB - Respondents in Stated Preference studies may be uncertain about their preferences for the good presented to them. Inspired by Wang (J Environ Econ Manag 32:219–232, 1997) we hypothesize that respondents’ stated certainty in choice increases with the utility difference between the alternative chosen and the best alternative to that. We test this hypothesis using data from two independent Choice Experiments both focusing on nature values. In modelling respondents’ self-reported certainty in choice, we find evidence that the stated level of certainty increases significantly as utility difference in choice sets increases. In addition, stated certainty increases with income. Furthermore, there is some evidence that male respondents are inherently more certain in their choices than females, and a learning effect may increase stated certainty. We find evidence of this in the first study where the good is described in rather broad and generic terms, but not in the second study where a more specific description of the good is used.

U2 - 10.1007/s10640-010-9443-9

DO - 10.1007/s10640-010-9443-9

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0924-6460

VL - 49

SP - 491

EP - 510

JO - Environmental and Resource Economics

JF - Environmental and Resource Economics

IS - 4

ER -