Thirty autosomal insertion-deletion polymorphisms analyzed using the Investigator(®) DIPplex Kit in populations from Iraq, Lithuania, Slovenia, and Turkey

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thirty autosomal insertion-deletion polymorphisms analyzed using the Investigator(®) DIPplex Kit in populations from Iraq, Lithuania, Slovenia, and Turkey

AU - Tomas Mas, Carmen

AU - Poulsen, L

AU - Drobnič, K

AU - Ivanova, V

AU - Jankauskiene, J

AU - Bunokiene, D

AU - Børsting, C

AU - Morling, N

N1 - Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Thirty autosomal insertion-deletion (InDel) polymorphisms were analyzed in four populations from Iraq, Lithuania, Slovenia, and Turkey using the commercial kit Investigator(®) DIPplex. Genotyping issues were encountered for five of the 30 InDels. They were most probably caused by polymorphisms located in the primer binding sites. Population and forensic parameters were calculated. No significant deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium or significant linkage disequilibrium were detected. The observed heterozygosities ranged from 33% to 61% depending on the marker and the population. The combined probability of exclusion for the 30 markers was 99.7% in all four populations and the matching probabilities were 1 in 3-4×10(12) individuals. The multidimensional scaling plot drawn from FST distances showed a good concordance between the relative position of the 15 populations included in the plot and their geographic locations.

AB - Thirty autosomal insertion-deletion (InDel) polymorphisms were analyzed in four populations from Iraq, Lithuania, Slovenia, and Turkey using the commercial kit Investigator(®) DIPplex. Genotyping issues were encountered for five of the 30 InDels. They were most probably caused by polymorphisms located in the primer binding sites. Population and forensic parameters were calculated. No significant deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium or significant linkage disequilibrium were detected. The observed heterozygosities ranged from 33% to 61% depending on the marker and the population. The combined probability of exclusion for the 30 markers was 99.7% in all four populations and the matching probabilities were 1 in 3-4×10(12) individuals. The multidimensional scaling plot drawn from FST distances showed a good concordance between the relative position of the 15 populations included in the plot and their geographic locations.

U2 - 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.08.006

DO - 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.08.006

M3 - Letter

C2 - 27599378

SN - 1872-4973

VL - 25

SP - 142

EP - 144

JO - Forensic Science International: Genetics

JF - Forensic Science International: Genetics

ER -