The myth of the poor fisher: Evidence from the Nordic countries

Max Nielsen; Frank Asche; Ole Bergesen; Johan Blomquist; Edgar Henriksen; Ayoe Hoff; Rasmus Nielsen; Jónas R. Viðarsson; Staffan Waldo

doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.003

The myth of the poor fisher: Evidence from the Nordic countries

Max Nielsen, Frank Asche^*, Ole Bergesen, Johan Blomquist, Edgar Henriksen, Ayoe Hoff, Rasmus Nielsen, Jónas R. Viðarsson, Staffan Waldo

^*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Sektion for Miljø og Naturressourcer

10 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Fishers are often perceived to be poor, and low income levels are used to justify subsidies and other types of direct and indirect income support to maintain coastal communities. In this study fishers’ income levels are investigated in four Nordic countries; Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden for different types of fishers and vessels and in comparison to alternative occupations. The most important result is that fishers in these countries are doing relatively well, and only in Sweden is the fishers’ average income level below the average national income. Within the fleets, there are substantial differences. Owners of coastal vessels tend to have the lowest income, and also lower than crews. Owners as well as crews on larger vessels tend to do much better and in the largest fishing nations, Iceland and Norway, they do especially well.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Marine Policy
Vol/bind	93
Sider (fra-til)	186-194
Antal sider	9
ISSN	0308-597X
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.003
Status	Udgivet - 2018

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.003

Citationsformater

@article{ef3f40e371fc40269687b1a1a1427a6e,

title = "The myth of the poor fisher: Evidence from the Nordic countries",

abstract = "Fishers are often perceived to be poor, and low income levels are used to justify subsidies and other types of direct and indirect income support to maintain coastal communities. In this study fishers{\textquoteright} income levels are investigated in four Nordic countries; Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden for different types of fishers and vessels and in comparison to alternative occupations. The most important result is that fishers in these countries are doing relatively well, and only in Sweden is the fishers{\textquoteright} average income level below the average national income. Within the fleets, there are substantial differences. Owners of coastal vessels tend to have the lowest income, and also lower than crews. Owners as well as crews on larger vessels tend to do much better and in the largest fishing nations, Iceland and Norway, they do especially well.",

keywords = "Fisher income, Livelihood, Nordic",

author = "Max Nielsen and Frank Asche and Ole Bergesen and Johan Blomquist and Edgar Henriksen and Ayoe Hoff and Rasmus Nielsen and Vi{\dh}arsson, {J{\'o}nas R.} and Staffan Waldo",

year = "2018",

doi = "10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.003",

language = "English",

volume = "93",

pages = "186--194",

journal = "Marine Policy",

issn = "0308-597X",

publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The myth of the poor fisher

T2 - Evidence from the Nordic countries

AU - Nielsen, Max

AU - Asche, Frank

AU - Bergesen, Ole

AU - Blomquist, Johan

AU - Henriksen, Edgar

AU - Hoff, Ayoe

AU - Nielsen, Rasmus

AU - Viðarsson, Jónas R.

AU - Waldo, Staffan

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Fishers are often perceived to be poor, and low income levels are used to justify subsidies and other types of direct and indirect income support to maintain coastal communities. In this study fishers’ income levels are investigated in four Nordic countries; Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden for different types of fishers and vessels and in comparison to alternative occupations. The most important result is that fishers in these countries are doing relatively well, and only in Sweden is the fishers’ average income level below the average national income. Within the fleets, there are substantial differences. Owners of coastal vessels tend to have the lowest income, and also lower than crews. Owners as well as crews on larger vessels tend to do much better and in the largest fishing nations, Iceland and Norway, they do especially well.

AB - Fishers are often perceived to be poor, and low income levels are used to justify subsidies and other types of direct and indirect income support to maintain coastal communities. In this study fishers’ income levels are investigated in four Nordic countries; Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden for different types of fishers and vessels and in comparison to alternative occupations. The most important result is that fishers in these countries are doing relatively well, and only in Sweden is the fishers’ average income level below the average national income. Within the fleets, there are substantial differences. Owners of coastal vessels tend to have the lowest income, and also lower than crews. Owners as well as crews on larger vessels tend to do much better and in the largest fishing nations, Iceland and Norway, they do especially well.

KW - Fisher income

KW - Livelihood

KW - Nordic

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.003

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85046370194

SN - 0308-597X

VL - 93

SP - 186

EP - 194

JO - Marine Policy

JF - Marine Policy

ER -

The myth of the poor fisher: Evidence from the Nordic countries

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater