The end of International Relations theory?

Tim Dunne, Lene Hansen, Colin Wight

    135 Citationer (Scopus)

    Abstract

    With a view to providing contextual background for the Special Issue, this opening article analyses several dimensions of ‘The end of International Relations theory?’ It opens with a consideration of the status of different types of theory. Thereafter, we look at the proliferation of theories that has taken place since the emergence of the third/fourth debate. The coexistence and competition between an ever-greater number of theories begs the question: what kind of theoretical pluralism should IR scholars embrace? We offer a particular account of theoretical engagement that is preferable to the alternatives currently being practised: integrative pluralism. The article ends on a cautiously optimistic note: given the disciplinary competition that now exists in relation to explaining and understanding global social forces, International Relations may find resilience because it has become theory-led, theory-literate and theory-concerned
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftEuropean Journal of International Relations
    Vol/bind19
    Udgave nummer3
    Sider (fra-til)405-425
    Antal sider21
    ISSN1354-0661
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - sep. 2013

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'The end of International Relations theory?'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater