The Copenhagen Triage Algorithm: a randomized controlled trial

Rasmus Bo Hasselbalch; Louis Lind Plesner; Mia Pries-Heje; Lisbet Ravn; Morten Lind; Rasmus Greibe; Birgitte Nybo Jensen; Lars S Rasmussen; Kasper Iversen

doi:10.1186/s13049-016-0312-6

The Copenhagen Triage Algorithm: a randomized controlled trial

Rasmus Bo Hasselbalch, Louis Lind Plesner, Mia Pries-Heje, Lisbet Ravn, Morten Lind, Rasmus Greibe, Birgitte Nybo Jensen, Lars S Rasmussen, Kasper Iversen

Institut for Klinisk Medicin

4 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Crowding in the emergency department (ED) is a well-known problem resulting in an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Effective triage might counteract this problem by identifying the sickest patients and ensuring early treatment. In the last two decades, systematic triage has become the standard in ED's worldwide. However, triage models are also time consuming, supported by limited evidence and could potentially be of more harm than benefit. The aim of this study is to develop a quicker triage model using data from a large cohort of unselected ED patients and evaluate if this new model is non-inferior to an existing triage model in a prospective randomized trial. Methods: The Copenhagen Triage Algorithm (CTA) study is a prospective two-center, cluster-randomized, cross-over, non-inferiority trial comparing CTA to the Danish Emergency Process Triage (DEPT). We include patients ≥16 years (n = 50.000) admitted to the ED in two large acute hospitals. Centers are randomly assigned to perform either CTA or DEPT triage first and then use the other triage model in the last time period. The CTA stratifies patients into 5 acuity levels in two steps. First, a scoring chart based on vital values is used to classify patients in an immediate category. Second, a clinical assessment by the ED nurse can alter the result suggested by the score up to two categories up or one down. The primary end-point is 30-day mortality and secondary end-points are length of stay, time to treatment, admission to intensive care unit, and readmission within 30 days. Discussion: If proven non-inferior to standard DEPT triage, CTA will be a faster and simpler triage model that is still able to detect the critically ill. Simplifying triage will lessen the burden for the ED staff and possibly allow faster treatment. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02698319, registered 24.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Artikelnummer	123
Tidsskrift	Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Vol/bind	24
Antal sider	6
ISSN	1757-7241
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0312-6
Status	Udgivet - 10 okt. 2016

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1186/s13049-016-0312-6

Citationsformater

@article{3f34d1f46d244cf3808118b49352edfe,

title = "The Copenhagen Triage Algorithm: a randomized controlled trial",

abstract = "Background: Crowding in the emergency department (ED) is a well-known problem resulting in an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Effective triage might counteract this problem by identifying the sickest patients and ensuring early treatment. In the last two decades, systematic triage has become the standard in ED's worldwide. However, triage models are also time consuming, supported by limited evidence and could potentially be of more harm than benefit. The aim of this study is to develop a quicker triage model using data from a large cohort of unselected ED patients and evaluate if this new model is non-inferior to an existing triage model in a prospective randomized trial. Methods: The Copenhagen Triage Algorithm (CTA) study is a prospective two-center, cluster-randomized, cross-over, non-inferiority trial comparing CTA to the Danish Emergency Process Triage (DEPT). We include patients ≥16 years (n = 50.000) admitted to the ED in two large acute hospitals. Centers are randomly assigned to perform either CTA or DEPT triage first and then use the other triage model in the last time period. The CTA stratifies patients into 5 acuity levels in two steps. First, a scoring chart based on vital values is used to classify patients in an immediate category. Second, a clinical assessment by the ED nurse can alter the result suggested by the score up to two categories up or one down. The primary end-point is 30-day mortality and secondary end-points are length of stay, time to treatment, admission to intensive care unit, and readmission within 30 days. Discussion: If proven non-inferior to standard DEPT triage, CTA will be a faster and simpler triage model that is still able to detect the critically ill. Simplifying triage will lessen the burden for the ED staff and possibly allow faster treatment. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02698319, registered 24.",

keywords = "Algorithms, Critical Illness, Cross-Over Studies, Denmark, Female, Hospital Mortality, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Prospective Studies, Survival Rate, Triage, Wounds and Injuries, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial",

author = "Hasselbalch, {Rasmus Bo} and Plesner, {Louis Lind} and Mia Pries-Heje and Lisbet Ravn and Morten Lind and Rasmus Greibe and Jensen, {Birgitte Nybo} and Rasmussen, {Lars S} and Kasper Iversen",

year = "2016",

month = oct,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1186/s13049-016-0312-6",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine",

issn = "1757-7241",

publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Copenhagen Triage Algorithm

T2 - a randomized controlled trial

AU - Hasselbalch, Rasmus Bo

AU - Plesner, Louis Lind

AU - Pries-Heje, Mia

AU - Ravn, Lisbet

AU - Lind, Morten

AU - Greibe, Rasmus

AU - Jensen, Birgitte Nybo

AU - Rasmussen, Lars S

AU - Iversen, Kasper

PY - 2016/10/10

Y1 - 2016/10/10

N2 - Background: Crowding in the emergency department (ED) is a well-known problem resulting in an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Effective triage might counteract this problem by identifying the sickest patients and ensuring early treatment. In the last two decades, systematic triage has become the standard in ED's worldwide. However, triage models are also time consuming, supported by limited evidence and could potentially be of more harm than benefit. The aim of this study is to develop a quicker triage model using data from a large cohort of unselected ED patients and evaluate if this new model is non-inferior to an existing triage model in a prospective randomized trial. Methods: The Copenhagen Triage Algorithm (CTA) study is a prospective two-center, cluster-randomized, cross-over, non-inferiority trial comparing CTA to the Danish Emergency Process Triage (DEPT). We include patients ≥16 years (n = 50.000) admitted to the ED in two large acute hospitals. Centers are randomly assigned to perform either CTA or DEPT triage first and then use the other triage model in the last time period. The CTA stratifies patients into 5 acuity levels in two steps. First, a scoring chart based on vital values is used to classify patients in an immediate category. Second, a clinical assessment by the ED nurse can alter the result suggested by the score up to two categories up or one down. The primary end-point is 30-day mortality and secondary end-points are length of stay, time to treatment, admission to intensive care unit, and readmission within 30 days. Discussion: If proven non-inferior to standard DEPT triage, CTA will be a faster and simpler triage model that is still able to detect the critically ill. Simplifying triage will lessen the burden for the ED staff and possibly allow faster treatment. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02698319, registered 24.

AB - Background: Crowding in the emergency department (ED) is a well-known problem resulting in an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Effective triage might counteract this problem by identifying the sickest patients and ensuring early treatment. In the last two decades, systematic triage has become the standard in ED's worldwide. However, triage models are also time consuming, supported by limited evidence and could potentially be of more harm than benefit. The aim of this study is to develop a quicker triage model using data from a large cohort of unselected ED patients and evaluate if this new model is non-inferior to an existing triage model in a prospective randomized trial. Methods: The Copenhagen Triage Algorithm (CTA) study is a prospective two-center, cluster-randomized, cross-over, non-inferiority trial comparing CTA to the Danish Emergency Process Triage (DEPT). We include patients ≥16 years (n = 50.000) admitted to the ED in two large acute hospitals. Centers are randomly assigned to perform either CTA or DEPT triage first and then use the other triage model in the last time period. The CTA stratifies patients into 5 acuity levels in two steps. First, a scoring chart based on vital values is used to classify patients in an immediate category. Second, a clinical assessment by the ED nurse can alter the result suggested by the score up to two categories up or one down. The primary end-point is 30-day mortality and secondary end-points are length of stay, time to treatment, admission to intensive care unit, and readmission within 30 days. Discussion: If proven non-inferior to standard DEPT triage, CTA will be a faster and simpler triage model that is still able to detect the critically ill. Simplifying triage will lessen the burden for the ED staff and possibly allow faster treatment. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02698319, registered 24.

KW - Algorithms

KW - Critical Illness

KW - Cross-Over Studies

KW - Denmark

KW - Female

KW - Hospital Mortality

KW - Humans

KW - Intensive Care Units

KW - Male

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Survival Rate

KW - Triage

KW - Wounds and Injuries

KW - Journal Article

KW - Multicenter Study

KW - Randomized Controlled Trial

U2 - 10.1186/s13049-016-0312-6

DO - 10.1186/s13049-016-0312-6

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27724978

SN - 1757-7241

VL - 24

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

M1 - 123

ER -

The Copenhagen Triage Algorithm: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater