Abstract
HIV testing and divination are both performances that offer access to privileged knowledge about grave problems. In comparing this relatively new technology with a very old technology of knowledge, we consider the experience-near analogies in the ritual performance of discovery and the handling of uncertainty. Specialists must convince inquirers that the knowledge revealed is true. Inquirers test the provisional truths these practices offer by seeking a second opinion and by considering the outcomes in the light of previous and subsequent experience. The kinds of evidence deployed and the nature of the institutional landscape in HIV testing differ sharply from those of divination. Yet both practices show how tests must be embedded in the worlds they purport to affect.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory |
| Vol/bind | 8 |
| Udgave nummer | 1-2 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 97-108 |
| ISSN | 2049-1115 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 1 mar. 2018 |
Emneord
- Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultet
FN’s Verdensmål
Dette resultat bidrager til følgende verdensmål
