Taking the negative view of current migraine treatments: the unmet needs

Peer Tfelt-Hansen, Jes Olesen

    50 Citationer (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Acute migraine treatment is given to abolish ongoing attacks, while prophylactic migraine treatment is given on a daily basis to prevent the occurrence of migraine attacks as far as possible. The majority of migraine patients do not use the specific acute anti-migraine drugs, the triptans. Thus, only 10% (Denmark) to 35% (France) of migraine patients use triptans. This is most likely due to relatively low efficacy. Thus, in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) pain freedom after 2 hours ranges from 12% (frovatriptan 2.5¿mg) to 40% (rizatriptan 10¿mg). For prophylactic treatment (propranolol, valproate, topiramate) a response (at least a 50% reduction in migraine frequency) is observed in 40-50%. In addition, prophylactic treatment is hampered by adverse events and withdrawals. There is a need for new acute anti-migraine drugs and targets are already available and there are more to come. It has been estimated that approximately 2% of the adult population need prophylactic treatment because of frequent migraine attacks. For prophylactic migraine drugs there is an even greater need for new drugs than for acute drug treatment.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftC N S Drugs
    Vol/bind26
    Udgave nummer5
    Sider (fra-til)375-82
    Antal sider8
    ISSN1172-7047
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2012

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Taking the negative view of current migraine treatments: the unmet needs'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater