Strained Compromises?: Flexicurity during crisis

Christian Lyhne Ibsen

Strained Compromises? Flexicurity during crisis

874 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Danish version of flexicurity is not only about a balance between labour market flexibility and social security. Arguably, it is also series of more or less stable underlying compromises between social partners about the main mechanisms and aims of labour market regulation which – supposedly – should be focused on employment rather than jobs and competition on quality rather than on labour costs. However, most studies on Danish flexicurity have been carried out under favourable economic conditions with social partners almost naturally agreeing to the merits of the model – at least in principle. But has the current recession challenged these compromises? The present paper analyses the robustness of agreement by comparing social partner responses before and during the current economic recession. The evidence suggests that the underlying compromises are indeed strained by the economic cycle which underlines the dangers of building models based on short periods of stability.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Publikationsdato	2010
Antal sider	17
Status	Udgivet - 2010
Begivenhed	The 9th European congress of the International Industrial Relations Association - København, Danmark Varighed: 28 jun. 2010 → 1 jul. 2010

Konference

Konference	The 9th European congress of the International Industrial Relations Association
Land/Område	Danmark
By	København
Periode	28/06/2010 → 01/07/2010

Adgang til dokumentet

Strained compromises finalIndsendt manuskript, 129 KB

Citationsformater

@conference{ca854940418611df928f000ea68e967b,

title = "Strained Compromises?: Flexicurity during crisis",

abstract = "The Danish version of flexicurity is not only about a balance between labour market flexibility and social security. Arguably, it is also series of more or less stable underlying compromises between social partners about the main mechanisms and aims of labour market regulation which – supposedly – should be focused on employment rather than jobs and competition on quality rather than on labour costs. However, most studies on Danish flexicurity have been carried out under favourable economic conditions with social partners almost naturally agreeing to the merits of the model – at least in principle. But has the current recession challenged these compromises? The present paper analyses the robustness of agreement by comparing social partner responses before and during the current economic recession. The evidence suggests that the underlying compromises are indeed strained by the economic cycle which underlines the dangers of building models based on short periods of stability. ",

author = "Ibsen, {Christian Lyhne}",

year = "2010",

language = "English",

note = "The 9th European congress of the International Industrial Relations Association ; Conference date: 28-06-2010 Through 01-07-2010",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Strained Compromises?

T2 - The 9th European congress of the International Industrial Relations Association

AU - Ibsen, Christian Lyhne

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The Danish version of flexicurity is not only about a balance between labour market flexibility and social security. Arguably, it is also series of more or less stable underlying compromises between social partners about the main mechanisms and aims of labour market regulation which – supposedly – should be focused on employment rather than jobs and competition on quality rather than on labour costs. However, most studies on Danish flexicurity have been carried out under favourable economic conditions with social partners almost naturally agreeing to the merits of the model – at least in principle. But has the current recession challenged these compromises? The present paper analyses the robustness of agreement by comparing social partner responses before and during the current economic recession. The evidence suggests that the underlying compromises are indeed strained by the economic cycle which underlines the dangers of building models based on short periods of stability.

AB - The Danish version of flexicurity is not only about a balance between labour market flexibility and social security. Arguably, it is also series of more or less stable underlying compromises between social partners about the main mechanisms and aims of labour market regulation which – supposedly – should be focused on employment rather than jobs and competition on quality rather than on labour costs. However, most studies on Danish flexicurity have been carried out under favourable economic conditions with social partners almost naturally agreeing to the merits of the model – at least in principle. But has the current recession challenged these compromises? The present paper analyses the robustness of agreement by comparing social partner responses before and during the current economic recession. The evidence suggests that the underlying compromises are indeed strained by the economic cycle which underlines the dangers of building models based on short periods of stability.

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 28 June 2010 through 1 July 2010

ER -