TY - JOUR
T1 - Standardized benchmarking in the quest for orthologs
AU - Altenhoff, Adrian M
AU - Boeckmann, Brigitte
AU - Capella-Gutierrez, Salvador
AU - Dalquen, Daniel A
AU - DeLuca, Todd
AU - Forslund, Kristoffer
AU - Huerta-Cepas, Jaime
AU - Linard, Benjamin
AU - Pereira, Cécile
AU - Pryszcz, Leszek P
AU - Schreiber, Fabian
AU - da Silva, Alan Sousa
AU - Szklarczyk, Damian
AU - Train, Clément-Marie
AU - Bork, Peer
AU - Lecompte, Odile
AU - von Mering, Christian
AU - Xenarios, Ioannis
AU - Sjölander, Kimmen
AU - Jensen, Lars Juhl
AU - Martin, Maria J
AU - Muffato, Matthieu
AU - Gabaldón, Toni
AU - Lewis, Suzanna E
AU - Thomas, Paul D
AU - Sonnhammer, Erik
AU - Dessimoz, Christophe
AU - Quest for Orthologs consortium
N1 - AR2016
PY - 2016/5/1
Y1 - 2016/5/1
N2 - Achieving high accuracy in orthology inference is essential for many comparative, evolutionary and functional genomic analyses, yet the true evolutionary history of genes is generally unknown and orthologs are used for very different applications across phyla, requiring different precision-recall trade-offs. As a result, it is difficult to assess the performance of orthology inference methods. Here, we present a community effort to establish standards and an automated web-based service to facilitate orthology benchmarking. Using this service, we characterize 15 well-established inference methods and resources on a battery of 20 different benchmarks. Standardized benchmarking provides a way for users to identify the most effective methods for the problem at hand, sets a minimum requirement for new tools and resources, and guides the development of more accurate orthology inference methods.
AB - Achieving high accuracy in orthology inference is essential for many comparative, evolutionary and functional genomic analyses, yet the true evolutionary history of genes is generally unknown and orthologs are used for very different applications across phyla, requiring different precision-recall trade-offs. As a result, it is difficult to assess the performance of orthology inference methods. Here, we present a community effort to establish standards and an automated web-based service to facilitate orthology benchmarking. Using this service, we characterize 15 well-established inference methods and resources on a battery of 20 different benchmarks. Standardized benchmarking provides a way for users to identify the most effective methods for the problem at hand, sets a minimum requirement for new tools and resources, and guides the development of more accurate orthology inference methods.
U2 - 10.1038/nmeth.3830
DO - 10.1038/nmeth.3830
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 27043882
SN - 1548-7091
VL - 13
SP - 425
EP - 430
JO - Nature Methods
JF - Nature Methods
ER -