Spreading depolarizations and late secondary insults after traumatic brain injury

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spreading depolarizations and late secondary insults after traumatic brain injury

AU - Hartings, Jed A

AU - Strong, Anthony J

AU - Fabricius, Martin

AU - Manning, Andrew

AU - Bhatia, Robin

AU - Dreier, Jens P

AU - Mazzeo, Anna Teresa

AU - Tortella, Frank C

AU - Bullock, M Ross

AU - Co-Operative Study of Brain Injury Depolarizations

N1 - Keywords: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Pressure; Body Temperature; Brain Injuries; Cerebrovascular Circulation; Cortical Spreading Depression; Electrophysiology; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Young Adult

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Here we investigated the incidence of cortical spreading depolarizations (spreading depression and peri-infarct depolarization) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their relationship to systemic physiologic values during neurointensive care. Subdural electrode strips were placed on peri-contusional cortex in 32 patients who underwent surgical treatment for TBI. Prospective electrocorticography was performed during neurointensive care with retrospective analysis of hourly nursing chart data. Recordings were 84 hr (median) per patient and 2,503 hr in total. In 17 patients (53%), 280 spreading depolarizations (spreading depressions and peri-infarct depolarizations) were observed. Depolarizations occurred in a bimodal pattern with peak incidence on days 1 and 7. The probability of a depolarization occurring increased significantly as a function of declining mean arterial pressure (MAP; R(2) = 0.78; p < 0.001) and cerebral perfusion pressure (R(2) = 0.85; p < 0.01), and increasing core temperature (R(2) = 0.44; p < 0.05). Depolarization probability was 7% for MAP values of >100 mm Hg but 33% for MAP of < or =70 mm Hg. Temperatures of < or =38.4 degrees C were associated with a 21% depolarization risk, compared to 63% for >38.4 degrees C. Intracranial pressures were higher in patients with depolarizations (18.3 +/- 9.3 vs. 13.5 +/- 6.7 mm Hg; p < 0.001). We conclude that depolarization phenomena are a common cortical pathology in TBI. Their association with lower perfusion levels and higher temperatures suggests that the labile balance of energy supply and demand is an important determinant of their occurrence. Monitoring of depolarizations might serve as a functional measure to guide therapeutic efforts and their blockade may provide an additional line of defense against the effects of secondary insults.

AB - Here we investigated the incidence of cortical spreading depolarizations (spreading depression and peri-infarct depolarization) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their relationship to systemic physiologic values during neurointensive care. Subdural electrode strips were placed on peri-contusional cortex in 32 patients who underwent surgical treatment for TBI. Prospective electrocorticography was performed during neurointensive care with retrospective analysis of hourly nursing chart data. Recordings were 84 hr (median) per patient and 2,503 hr in total. In 17 patients (53%), 280 spreading depolarizations (spreading depressions and peri-infarct depolarizations) were observed. Depolarizations occurred in a bimodal pattern with peak incidence on days 1 and 7. The probability of a depolarization occurring increased significantly as a function of declining mean arterial pressure (MAP; R(2) = 0.78; p < 0.001) and cerebral perfusion pressure (R(2) = 0.85; p < 0.01), and increasing core temperature (R(2) = 0.44; p < 0.05). Depolarization probability was 7% for MAP values of >100 mm Hg but 33% for MAP of < or =70 mm Hg. Temperatures of < or =38.4 degrees C were associated with a 21% depolarization risk, compared to 63% for >38.4 degrees C. Intracranial pressures were higher in patients with depolarizations (18.3 +/- 9.3 vs. 13.5 +/- 6.7 mm Hg; p < 0.001). We conclude that depolarization phenomena are a common cortical pathology in TBI. Their association with lower perfusion levels and higher temperatures suggests that the labile balance of energy supply and demand is an important determinant of their occurrence. Monitoring of depolarizations might serve as a functional measure to guide therapeutic efforts and their blockade may provide an additional line of defense against the effects of secondary insults.

U2 - 10.1089/neu.2009-0961

DO - 10.1089/neu.2009-0961

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 19508156

SN - 0897-7151

VL - 26

SP - 1857

EP - 1866

JO - Journal of Neurotrauma

JF - Journal of Neurotrauma

IS - 11

ER -