Social inequality in health, responsibility and egalitarian justice

Martin Marchman Andersen; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton; Christoffer Johansen; John Lynch; Nils Holtug

doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdt012

Social inequality in health, responsibility and egalitarian justice

Martin Marchman Andersen, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton, Christoffer Johansen, John Lynch, Nils Holtug

Institut for Kommunikation

18 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Are social inequalities in health unjust when brought about by differences in lifestyle? A widespread idea, luck egalitarianism, is that inequality stemming from individuals’ free choices is not to be considered unjust, since individuals, presumably, are themselves responsible for such choices. Thus, to the extent that lifestyles are in fact results of free choices, social inequality in health brought about by these choices is not in tension with egalitarian justice. If this is so, then it may put in question the justification of free and equal access to health care and existing medical research priorities. However, personal responsibility is a highly contested issue and in this article we first consider the case for, and second the case against, personal responsibility for health in light of recent developments in philosophical accounts of responsibility and equality. We suggest – but do not fully establish - that at the most fundamental level people are never responsible in such a way that appeals to individuals’ own responsibility can justify inequalities in health.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Journal of Public Health
Vol/bind	35
Udgave nummer	1
Sider (fra-til)	4-8
Antal sider	5
ISSN	1741-3842
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdt012
Status	Udgivet - mar. 2013

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1093/pubmed/fdt012

http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/fdt012? ijkey=frtEKkZDxcN99WX&keytype=ref

Citationsformater

@article{1a780f0bd35a4382935321d9fb80902a,

title = "Social inequality in health, responsibility and egalitarian justice",

abstract = "Are social inequalities in health unjust when brought about by differences in lifestyle? A widespread idea, luck egalitarianism, is that inequality stemming from individuals{\textquoteright} free choices is not to be considered unjust, since individuals, presumably, are themselves responsible for such choices. Thus, to the extent that lifestyles are in fact results of free choices, social inequality in health brought about by these choices is not in tension with egalitarian justice. If this is so, then it may put in question the justification of free and equal access to health care and existing medical research priorities. However, personal responsibility is a highly contested issue and in this article we first consider the case for, and second the case against, personal responsibility for health in light of recent developments in philosophical accounts of responsibility and equality. We suggest – but do not fully establish - that at the most fundamental level people are never responsible in such a way that appeals to individuals{\textquoteright} own responsibility can justify inequalities in health. ",

author = "Andersen, {Martin Marchman} and Dalton, {Susanne Oksbjerg} and Christoffer Johansen and John Lynch and Nils Holtug",

year = "2013",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1093/pubmed/fdt012",

language = "English",

volume = "35",

pages = "4--8",

journal = "Journal of Public Health",

issn = "1741-3842",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social inequality in health, responsibility and egalitarian justice

AU - Andersen, Martin Marchman

AU - Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerg

AU - Johansen, Christoffer

AU - Lynch, John

AU - Holtug, Nils

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Are social inequalities in health unjust when brought about by differences in lifestyle? A widespread idea, luck egalitarianism, is that inequality stemming from individuals’ free choices is not to be considered unjust, since individuals, presumably, are themselves responsible for such choices. Thus, to the extent that lifestyles are in fact results of free choices, social inequality in health brought about by these choices is not in tension with egalitarian justice. If this is so, then it may put in question the justification of free and equal access to health care and existing medical research priorities. However, personal responsibility is a highly contested issue and in this article we first consider the case for, and second the case against, personal responsibility for health in light of recent developments in philosophical accounts of responsibility and equality. We suggest – but do not fully establish - that at the most fundamental level people are never responsible in such a way that appeals to individuals’ own responsibility can justify inequalities in health.

AB - Are social inequalities in health unjust when brought about by differences in lifestyle? A widespread idea, luck egalitarianism, is that inequality stemming from individuals’ free choices is not to be considered unjust, since individuals, presumably, are themselves responsible for such choices. Thus, to the extent that lifestyles are in fact results of free choices, social inequality in health brought about by these choices is not in tension with egalitarian justice. If this is so, then it may put in question the justification of free and equal access to health care and existing medical research priorities. However, personal responsibility is a highly contested issue and in this article we first consider the case for, and second the case against, personal responsibility for health in light of recent developments in philosophical accounts of responsibility and equality. We suggest – but do not fully establish - that at the most fundamental level people are never responsible in such a way that appeals to individuals’ own responsibility can justify inequalities in health.

U2 - 10.1093/pubmed/fdt012

DO - 10.1093/pubmed/fdt012

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23436200

SN - 1741-3842

VL - 35

SP - 4

EP - 8

JO - Journal of Public Health

JF - Journal of Public Health

IS - 1

ER -