Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: A decision tree approach

Paula A. Harrison; Robert Dunford; David Barton; Eszter Keleman; Berta Martin- Lopez; Lisa Norton; Mette Termansen; Heli Saarikoski; Kees Hendriks; Eric Gómez-Baggethun; Bálint Czúcz; Marina García Llorente; David Howard; Sander Jacobs; Martin Karlsen; Leena Kopperoinen; Anders Madsen; Graciela M. Rusch; Michiel Eupen; Peter Verweij; Rognvald Smith; Diana Tuomasjukka; Grazia Zulian

doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016

Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: A decision tree approach

Paula A. Harrison, Robert Dunford, David Barton, Eszter Keleman, Berta Martin- Lopez, Lisa Norton, Mette Termansen, Heli Saarikoski, Kees Hendriks, Eric Gómez-Baggethun, Bálint Czúcz, Marina García Llorente, David Howard, Sander Jacobs, Martin Karlsen, Leena Kopperoinen, Anders Madsen, Graciela M. Rusch, Michiel Eupen, Peter VerweijRognvald Smith, Diana Tuomasjukka, Grazia Zulian

68 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

A range of methods are available for assessing ecosystem services. Methods differ in their aims; from mapping and modelling the supply and demand of ecosystem services to appraising their economic and non-economic importance through valuation techniques. Comprehensive guidance for the selection of appropriate ecosystem service assessment methods that address the requirements of different decision-making contexts is lacking. This paper tackles this gap using the experience from 27 case studies which applied different biophysical, socio-cultural and monetary valuation methods to operationalise the ecosystem service concept towards sustainable land, water and urban management. A survey of the reasons why the case study teams selected particular methods revealed that stakeholder-oriented reasons, such as stakeholder participation, inclusion of local knowledge and ease of communication, and decision-oriented reasons, such as the purpose of the case study and the ecosystem services at stake, were key considerations in selecting a method. Pragmatic reasons such as available data, resources and expertise were also important factors. This information was used to develop a set of linked decision trees, which aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners in choosing ecosystem service assessment methods that are suitable for their context.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Ecosystem Services
Vol/bind	29
Udgave nummer	C
Sider (fra-til)	481-498
Antal sider	18
ISSN	2212-0416
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016
Status	Udgivet - feb. 2018
Udgivet eksternt	Ja

Emneord

Guidance, Method, Decision trees, Biophysical, Monetary, Socio-cultural

FN’s Verdensmål

Dette resultat bidrager til følgende verdensmål

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016

Citationsformater

Harrison, P. A., Dunford, R., Barton, D., Keleman, E., Martin- Lopez, B., Norton, L., Termansen, M., Saarikoski, H., Hendriks, K., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Czúcz, B., Llorente, M. G., Howard, D., Jacobs, S., Karlsen, M., Kopperoinen, L., Madsen, A., Rusch, G. M., Eupen, M., ... Zulian, G. (2018). Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: A decision tree approach. Ecosystem Services, 29(C), 481-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016

Harrison, PA, Dunford, R, Barton, D, Keleman, E, Martin- Lopez, B, Norton, L, Termansen, M, Saarikoski, H, Hendriks, K, Gómez-Baggethun, E, Czúcz, B, Llorente, MG, Howard, D, Jacobs, S, Karlsen, M, Kopperoinen, L, Madsen, A, Rusch, GM, Eupen, M, Verweij, P, Smith, R, Tuomasjukka, D & Zulian, G 2018, 'Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: A decision tree approach', Ecosystem Services, bind 29, nr. C, s. 481-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016

@article{047bed75371d4b6faa1efb4d4c9f0066,

title = "Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: A decision tree approach",

abstract = "A range of methods are available for assessing ecosystem services. Methods differ in their aims; from mapping and modelling the supply and demand of ecosystem services to appraising their economic and non-economic importance through valuation techniques. Comprehensive guidance for the selection of appropriate ecosystem service assessment methods that address the requirements of different decision-making contexts is lacking. This paper tackles this gap using the experience from 27 case studies which applied different biophysical, socio-cultural and monetary valuation methods to operationalise the ecosystem service concept towards sustainable land, water and urban management. A survey of the reasons why the case study teams selected particular methods revealed that stakeholder-oriented reasons, such as stakeholder participation, inclusion of local knowledge and ease of communication, and decision-oriented reasons, such as the purpose of the case study and the ecosystem services at stake, were key considerations in selecting a method. Pragmatic reasons such as available data, resources and expertise were also important factors. This information was used to develop a set of linked decision trees, which aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners in choosing ecosystem service assessment methods that are suitable for their context.",

keywords = "Guidance, Method, Decision trees, Biophysical, Monetary, Socio-cultural",

author = "Harrison, {Paula A.} and Robert Dunford and David Barton and Eszter Keleman and {Martin- Lopez}, Berta and Lisa Norton and Mette Termansen and Heli Saarikoski and Kees Hendriks and Eric G{\'o}mez-Baggethun and B{\'a}lint Cz{\'u}cz and Llorente, {Marina Garc{\'i}a} and David Howard and Sander Jacobs and Martin Karlsen and Leena Kopperoinen and Anders Madsen and Rusch, {Graciela M.} and Michiel Eupen and Peter Verweij and Rognvald Smith and Diana Tuomasjukka and Grazia Zulian",

year = "2018",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "481--498",

journal = "Ecosystem Services",

issn = "2212-0416",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "C",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment

T2 - A decision tree approach

AU - Harrison, Paula A.

AU - Dunford, Robert

AU - Barton, David

AU - Keleman, Eszter

AU - Martin- Lopez, Berta

AU - Norton, Lisa

AU - Termansen, Mette

AU - Saarikoski, Heli

AU - Hendriks, Kees

AU - Gómez-Baggethun, Eric

AU - Czúcz, Bálint

AU - Llorente, Marina García

AU - Howard, David

AU - Jacobs, Sander

AU - Karlsen, Martin

AU - Kopperoinen, Leena

AU - Madsen, Anders

AU - Rusch, Graciela M.

AU - Eupen, Michiel

AU - Verweij, Peter

AU - Smith, Rognvald

AU - Tuomasjukka, Diana

AU - Zulian, Grazia

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - A range of methods are available for assessing ecosystem services. Methods differ in their aims; from mapping and modelling the supply and demand of ecosystem services to appraising their economic and non-economic importance through valuation techniques. Comprehensive guidance for the selection of appropriate ecosystem service assessment methods that address the requirements of different decision-making contexts is lacking. This paper tackles this gap using the experience from 27 case studies which applied different biophysical, socio-cultural and monetary valuation methods to operationalise the ecosystem service concept towards sustainable land, water and urban management. A survey of the reasons why the case study teams selected particular methods revealed that stakeholder-oriented reasons, such as stakeholder participation, inclusion of local knowledge and ease of communication, and decision-oriented reasons, such as the purpose of the case study and the ecosystem services at stake, were key considerations in selecting a method. Pragmatic reasons such as available data, resources and expertise were also important factors. This information was used to develop a set of linked decision trees, which aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners in choosing ecosystem service assessment methods that are suitable for their context.

AB - A range of methods are available for assessing ecosystem services. Methods differ in their aims; from mapping and modelling the supply and demand of ecosystem services to appraising their economic and non-economic importance through valuation techniques. Comprehensive guidance for the selection of appropriate ecosystem service assessment methods that address the requirements of different decision-making contexts is lacking. This paper tackles this gap using the experience from 27 case studies which applied different biophysical, socio-cultural and monetary valuation methods to operationalise the ecosystem service concept towards sustainable land, water and urban management. A survey of the reasons why the case study teams selected particular methods revealed that stakeholder-oriented reasons, such as stakeholder participation, inclusion of local knowledge and ease of communication, and decision-oriented reasons, such as the purpose of the case study and the ecosystem services at stake, were key considerations in selecting a method. Pragmatic reasons such as available data, resources and expertise were also important factors. This information was used to develop a set of linked decision trees, which aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners in choosing ecosystem service assessment methods that are suitable for their context.

KW - Guidance, Method, Decision trees, Biophysical, Monetary, Socio-cultural

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016

M3 - Journal article

SN - 2212-0416

VL - 29

SP - 481

EP - 498

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

IS - C

ER -

Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: A decision tree approach

Abstract

Emneord

FN’s Verdensmål

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater