Samtidsteologiens fokus og horisont

Niels Henrik Gregersen

Samtidsteologiens fokus og horisont

1334 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this response to Asle Eikrem's discussion of my program for "Systematic Theology as Contemporary Theology" (DTT 2008, 290- 310), I lay out my principled reasons for maintaining the distinction between Theology 1, 2 and 3. While I find Eikrem's proposals concerning the relation between the semantics and the pragmatics in Theology 1 revealing, I argue that systematic theology should not be understood as a purely theoretical metaphysics.

Originalsprog	Dansk
Tidsskrift	Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift
Vol/bind	74
Udgave nummer	2
Sider (fra-til)	167-172.
Antal sider	6
ISSN	0105-3191
Status	Udgivet - 2011

Adgang til dokumentet

Eikrem: Dogmatikk som samtidsteologi + Gregersen: Samtidsteologiens fokus og horisont: Svar til Asle EikremForlagets udgivne version, 370 KB

Citationsformater

@article{e69d6ac1165a4bf49abc849833e88da4,

title = "Samtidsteologiens fokus og horisont",

abstract = "In this response to Asle Eikrem's discussion of my program for {"}Systematic Theology as Contemporary Theology{"} (DTT 2008, 290- 310), I lay out my principled reasons for maintaining the distinction between Theology 1, 2 and 3. While I find Eikrem's proposals concerning the relation between the semantics and the pragmatics in Theology 1 revealing, I argue that systematic theology should not be understood as a purely theoretical metaphysics.",

author = "Gregersen, {Niels Henrik}",

year = "2011",

language = "Dansk",

volume = "74",

pages = "167--172.",

journal = "Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift",

issn = "0105-3191",

publisher = "Eksistensen",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Samtidsteologiens fokus og horisont

AU - Gregersen, Niels Henrik

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - In this response to Asle Eikrem's discussion of my program for "Systematic Theology as Contemporary Theology" (DTT 2008, 290- 310), I lay out my principled reasons for maintaining the distinction between Theology 1, 2 and 3. While I find Eikrem's proposals concerning the relation between the semantics and the pragmatics in Theology 1 revealing, I argue that systematic theology should not be understood as a purely theoretical metaphysics.

AB - In this response to Asle Eikrem's discussion of my program for "Systematic Theology as Contemporary Theology" (DTT 2008, 290- 310), I lay out my principled reasons for maintaining the distinction between Theology 1, 2 and 3. While I find Eikrem's proposals concerning the relation between the semantics and the pragmatics in Theology 1 revealing, I argue that systematic theology should not be understood as a purely theoretical metaphysics.

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

SN - 0105-3191

VL - 74

SP - 167-172.

JO - Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift

JF - Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift

IS - 2

ER -