Ritual Slaughter in the Modern Constitutional State: Religious Exceptions to Secular Animal Protection Laws

Ebrahim Afsah

Abstract

In this proposed presentation I intend to give a historical overview of the political and constitutional debates in selected European countries – including Germany, France, Great Britain, Holland and Scandinavia – from the nineteenth century to the present day, paying special attention to the shift in emphasis after mass Muslim immigration began in the 1960s. In this sense, the protection of animal welfare as a legitimate concern of the state can be placed in a wider context of secular concerns for vulnerable groups that violently clashes with pre-modern notions of religious or cultural autonomy. Similar in nature if not necessarily in intensity to questions of forced and/or underage marriage, male circumcision and female genital mutilation, the commitment of the secular state to animal welfare cannot summarily be rejected by demands for religious freedom.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Publikationsdato	18 feb. 2016
Antal sider	2
Status	Under udarbejdelse - 18 feb. 2016
Begivenhed	Harvard Workshop on Animals in Comparative Constitutional Law - Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Mass., USA Varighed: 18 feb. 2016 → 19 feb. 2016

Konference

Konference	Harvard Workshop on Animals in Comparative Constitutional Law
Lokation	Harvard Law School
Land/Område	USA
By	Cambridge, Mass.
Periode	18/02/2016 → 19/02/2016

FN’s Verdensmål

Dette resultat bidrager til følgende verdensmål

Citationsformater

@conference{eec693da8bd7400b88639a18aaca6e56,

title = "Ritual Slaughter in the Modern Constitutional State: Religious Exceptions to Secular Animal Protection Laws",

abstract = "In this proposed presentation I intend to give a historical overview of the political and constitutional debates in selected European countries – including Germany, France, Great Britain, Holland and Scandinavia – from the nineteenth century to the present day, paying special attention to the shift in emphasis after mass Muslim immigration began in the 1960s. In this sense, the protection of animal welfare as a legitimate concern of the state can be placed in a wider context of secular concerns for vulnerable groups that violently clashes with pre-modern notions of religious or cultural autonomy. Similar in nature if not necessarily in intensity to questions of forced and/or underage marriage, male circumcision and female genital mutilation, the commitment of the secular state to animal welfare cannot summarily be rejected by demands for religious freedom.",

author = "Ebrahim Afsah",

year = "2016",

month = feb,

day = "18",

language = "English",

note = "Harvard Workshop on Animals in Comparative Constitutional Law ; Conference date: 18-02-2016 Through 19-02-2016",

}

TY - ABST

T1 - Ritual Slaughter in the Modern Constitutional State

T2 - Harvard Workshop on Animals in Comparative Constitutional Law

AU - Afsah, Ebrahim

PY - 2016/2/18

Y1 - 2016/2/18

N2 - In this proposed presentation I intend to give a historical overview of the political and constitutional debates in selected European countries – including Germany, France, Great Britain, Holland and Scandinavia – from the nineteenth century to the present day, paying special attention to the shift in emphasis after mass Muslim immigration began in the 1960s. In this sense, the protection of animal welfare as a legitimate concern of the state can be placed in a wider context of secular concerns for vulnerable groups that violently clashes with pre-modern notions of religious or cultural autonomy. Similar in nature if not necessarily in intensity to questions of forced and/or underage marriage, male circumcision and female genital mutilation, the commitment of the secular state to animal welfare cannot summarily be rejected by demands for religious freedom.

AB - In this proposed presentation I intend to give a historical overview of the political and constitutional debates in selected European countries – including Germany, France, Great Britain, Holland and Scandinavia – from the nineteenth century to the present day, paying special attention to the shift in emphasis after mass Muslim immigration began in the 1960s. In this sense, the protection of animal welfare as a legitimate concern of the state can be placed in a wider context of secular concerns for vulnerable groups that violently clashes with pre-modern notions of religious or cultural autonomy. Similar in nature if not necessarily in intensity to questions of forced and/or underage marriage, male circumcision and female genital mutilation, the commitment of the secular state to animal welfare cannot summarily be rejected by demands for religious freedom.

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

Y2 - 18 February 2016 through 19 February 2016

ER -

Ritual Slaughter in the Modern Constitutional State: Religious Exceptions to Secular Animal Protection Laws

Abstract

Konference

FN’s Verdensmål

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater