Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopic examination and treatment of disorders in the oesophagus has been a part of the otolaryngological specialty since the introduction of the rigid endoscope. Today, both flexible and rigid oesophagoscopy (RO) is used to that end. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the RO. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all ROs performed at a head & neck department in a Danish hospital in the 2003-2011-period. Perforation of the oesophageal wall was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included: dental injury, mortality and, in case of a foreign body; location and successful removal. Results: A total of 483 ROs were performed. Four patients (0.8%) suffered perforation; three during removal of a foreign body in the lower part of the oesophagus and one as part of investigation for cancer. 46.2% of the procedures were performed to remove a foreign body and 32.7% as investigation for cancer. The majority of the foreign bodies were located in the superior part of the oesophagus and the objects were successfully removed in all but one case. Conclusion: Our results are well within the range of previously published material. We recommend that the risk of serious complications is taken into consideration when choosing this modality. Furthermore, we believe that this risk increases in the distal part of the oesophagus and recommend that the use of the RO in this area is reserved as a last resort option.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Danish Medical Bulletin (Online) |
| Vol/bind | 59 |
| Udgave nummer | 11 |
| Sider (fra-til) | A4528 |
| ISSN | 1603-9629 |
| Status | Udgivet - 2012 |
FN’s Verdensmål
Dette resultat bidrager til følgende verdensmål
