Response to Nuffield Council on Bioethics’ Genome editing and human reproduction: open call for evidence

Samfundsvidenskab

• Human Reproduction 100%
• bioethics 81%
• legal norm 32%
• evidence 31%
• genetic interventions 24%
• human dignity 23%
• reasonable precautions 12%
• academy 11%
• regulation 11%
• flexibility 10%
• Law 10%
• framework law 10%
• science ethics 10%
• patent rights 9%
• stakeholder 9%
• legislative initiatives 9%
• clinical use 9%
• market power 8%
• governance 8%
• legal considerations 8%
• technological progress 8%
• Legal development 8%
• National legislation 8%
• Academy of Sciences 7%
• Human Subjects 7%
• embryo 7%
• ethical implications 7%
• exemption 7%
• knowledge transfer 7%
• fundamental right 7%
• life sciences 7%
• communication 7%
• Clinical Trials 7%
• Regulatory framework 7%
• intellectual property 6%
• pedagogics 6%
• ban 6%
• conformity 6%
• public interest 6%
• environmental protection 6%
• patent 6%
• lawyer 6%
• evaluation 6%
• transparency 5%
• disaster 5%
• grant 5%
• jurisdiction 5%
• Italy 5%
• new technology 5%
• animal 5%
• respect 5%
• uncertainty 5%
• public policy 5%
• moral philosophy 4%
• scenario 4%
• medicine 4%
• European Union 4%
• dialogue 4%
• autonomy 4%
• knowledge 4%
• interpretation 4%
• citizen 4%
• responsibility 3%
• participation 3%