TY - JOUR
T1 - Reliable and Valid Assessment of Point-of-care Ultrasonography
AU - Todsen, Tobias
AU - Tolsgaard, Martin Grønnebæk
AU - Olsen, Beth Härstedt
AU - Henriksen, Birthe Merete
AU - Hillingsø, Jens Georg
AU - Konge, Lars
AU - Jensen, Morten Lind
AU - Ringsted, Charlotte
PY - 2015/2
Y1 - 2015/2
N2 - Objective: To explore the reliability and validity of the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) scale for point-of-care ultrasonography (POC US) performance. Background: POC US is increasingly used by clinicians and is an essential part of the management of acute surgical conditions. However, the quality of performance is highly operator-dependent. Therefore, reliable and valid assessment of trainees" ultrasonography competence is needed to ensure patient safety. Methods: Twenty-four physicians, representing novices, intermediates, and experts in POC US, scanned 4 different surgical patient cases in a controlled set-up. All ultrasound examinations were video-recorded and assessed by 2 blinded radiologists using OSAUS. Reliability was examined using generalizability theory. Construct validity was examined by comparing performance scores between the groups and by correlating physicians" OSAUS scores with diagnostic accuracy. Results: The generalizability coefficient was high (0.81) and a D-study demonstrated that 1 assessor and 5 cases would result in similar reliability. The construct validity of the OSAUS scale was supported by a significant difference in the mean scores between the novice group (17.0; SD 8.4) and the intermediate group (30.0; SD 10.1), P = 0.007, as well as between the intermediate group and the expert group (72.9; SD 4.4), P = 0.04, and by a high correlation between OSAUS scores and diagnostic accuracy (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.76; P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates high reliability as well as evidence of construct validity of the OSAUS scale for assessment of POC US competence. Hence, the OSAUS scale may be suitable for both in-training as well as endof-training assessment.
AB - Objective: To explore the reliability and validity of the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) scale for point-of-care ultrasonography (POC US) performance. Background: POC US is increasingly used by clinicians and is an essential part of the management of acute surgical conditions. However, the quality of performance is highly operator-dependent. Therefore, reliable and valid assessment of trainees" ultrasonography competence is needed to ensure patient safety. Methods: Twenty-four physicians, representing novices, intermediates, and experts in POC US, scanned 4 different surgical patient cases in a controlled set-up. All ultrasound examinations were video-recorded and assessed by 2 blinded radiologists using OSAUS. Reliability was examined using generalizability theory. Construct validity was examined by comparing performance scores between the groups and by correlating physicians" OSAUS scores with diagnostic accuracy. Results: The generalizability coefficient was high (0.81) and a D-study demonstrated that 1 assessor and 5 cases would result in similar reliability. The construct validity of the OSAUS scale was supported by a significant difference in the mean scores between the novice group (17.0; SD 8.4) and the intermediate group (30.0; SD 10.1), P = 0.007, as well as between the intermediate group and the expert group (72.9; SD 4.4), P = 0.04, and by a high correlation between OSAUS scores and diagnostic accuracy (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.76; P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates high reliability as well as evidence of construct validity of the OSAUS scale for assessment of POC US competence. Hence, the OSAUS scale may be suitable for both in-training as well as endof-training assessment.
KW - Abdomen
KW - Clinical Competence
KW - Humans
KW - Point-of-Care Systems
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Single-Blind Method
KW - Ultrasonography
KW - Video Recording
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000552
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000552
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 24509198
SN - 0003-4932
VL - 261
SP - 309
EP - 315
JO - Annals of Surgery
JF - Annals of Surgery
IS - 2
ER -