Relation Between Pressure and Volume Unloading During Ramp Testing in Patients Supported with a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relation Between Pressure and Volume Unloading During Ramp Testing in Patients Supported with a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device

AU - Jung, Mette H

AU - Hassager, Christian

AU - Balling, Louise

AU - Russell, Stuart D

AU - Boesgaard, Soeren

AU - Gustafsson, Finn

PY - 2015/7/20

Y1 - 2015/7/20

N2 - Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) is the key to describing left ventricular (LV) unloading; however, the relation between pressure and the echocardiography-derived surrogate of LV volume (LV end-diastolic diameter [LVEDD]) as a function of pump speed (revolutions per minute [RPM]) in continuous-flow LV assist device (CF-LVAD) patients is unknown. In this study, the pressure-volume relation as a function of RPM during ramp testing was investigated by simultaneously measuring PCWP by Swan-Ganz catheter and LVEDD by echocardiography. The ramp protocol started at usual pump setting (ramp-base) and then went from 8,000 RPM (ramp-low) increasing by 400 RPM/5 minutes until reaching 12,000 RPM or suction/arrhythmic event (ramp-high). The study was finalized by a 25 Watt exercise test at two ramp steps. Ten patients with ramp-base of 9,300 ± 241 RPM (at which 3 of 10 had aortic valve opening) were examined. At ramp-low, ramp-base, and ramp-high, PCWP was 20 ± 4, 14 ± 4, and 7 ± 3 mm Hg (p < 0.001 for all comparisons) and LVEDD 6.6 ± 1.0, 6.7 ± 0.9, and 5.5 ± 1.7 cm (p < 0.05 for all comparisons but ramp-low versus ramp-base). Correlation between PCWP and LVEDD slopes; R 2 = 0.53 (p = 0.02). In conclusion, PCWP as a function of RPM is weakly correlated with changes in LVEDD. Thus, LVEDD is not an accurate measure of unloading in CF-LVAD patients.

AB - Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) is the key to describing left ventricular (LV) unloading; however, the relation between pressure and the echocardiography-derived surrogate of LV volume (LV end-diastolic diameter [LVEDD]) as a function of pump speed (revolutions per minute [RPM]) in continuous-flow LV assist device (CF-LVAD) patients is unknown. In this study, the pressure-volume relation as a function of RPM during ramp testing was investigated by simultaneously measuring PCWP by Swan-Ganz catheter and LVEDD by echocardiography. The ramp protocol started at usual pump setting (ramp-base) and then went from 8,000 RPM (ramp-low) increasing by 400 RPM/5 minutes until reaching 12,000 RPM or suction/arrhythmic event (ramp-high). The study was finalized by a 25 Watt exercise test at two ramp steps. Ten patients with ramp-base of 9,300 ± 241 RPM (at which 3 of 10 had aortic valve opening) were examined. At ramp-low, ramp-base, and ramp-high, PCWP was 20 ± 4, 14 ± 4, and 7 ± 3 mm Hg (p < 0.001 for all comparisons) and LVEDD 6.6 ± 1.0, 6.7 ± 0.9, and 5.5 ± 1.7 cm (p < 0.05 for all comparisons but ramp-low versus ramp-base). Correlation between PCWP and LVEDD slopes; R 2 = 0.53 (p = 0.02). In conclusion, PCWP as a function of RPM is weakly correlated with changes in LVEDD. Thus, LVEDD is not an accurate measure of unloading in CF-LVAD patients.

U2 - 10.1097/mat.0000000000000194

DO - 10.1097/mat.0000000000000194

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25485566

SN - 1058-2916

VL - 61

SP - 307

EP - 312

JO - ASAIO Journal

JF - ASAIO Journal

IS - 3

ER -