Reflexivity, repetition, and language-making online

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflexivity, repetition, and language-making online

AU - Duncker, Dorthe

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

N2 - This paper considers the reflexivity of language and its value to linguistic analysis. The focus is on the metalinguistic concept of ‘repetition’ and on how repetition is implemented as an integral part of the communication process by participants engaged in written online communication. The conditions that govern repetition in episodes of communication are explored, and analytically relevant aspects for the processes of situated sign-making are identified. With an example from a longitudinal (retrospective) study of a Danish online forum it is shown how the continuity of such processes may be analysed, based on the digital traces of reflexive episodes left by participants over a period of 5 years (2009–2014). Everyday metalinguistic practices are not generally placed high on the linguistic research agenda, and linguists tend to be more concerned about the fact that linguistics itself ultimately depends on the reflexivity of language. However, it is argued that the reflexivity of language does not logically invalidate linguistics. On the contrary, it holds the solution to situated linguistic analysis.

AB - This paper considers the reflexivity of language and its value to linguistic analysis. The focus is on the metalinguistic concept of ‘repetition’ and on how repetition is implemented as an integral part of the communication process by participants engaged in written online communication. The conditions that govern repetition in episodes of communication are explored, and analytically relevant aspects for the processes of situated sign-making are identified. With an example from a longitudinal (retrospective) study of a Danish online forum it is shown how the continuity of such processes may be analysed, based on the digital traces of reflexive episodes left by participants over a period of 5 years (2009–2014). Everyday metalinguistic practices are not generally placed high on the linguistic research agenda, and linguists tend to be more concerned about the fact that linguistics itself ultimately depends on the reflexivity of language. However, it is argued that the reflexivity of language does not logically invalidate linguistics. On the contrary, it holds the solution to situated linguistic analysis.

U2 - 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.007

DO - 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.007

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0388-0001

VL - 61

SP - 28

EP - 42

JO - Language Sciences

JF - Language Sciences

ER -