Reflections on the Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia before the International Court of Justice

Yoshifumi Tanaka

Reflections on the Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia before the International Court of Justice

CEPRI - Centre for Private Governance

8 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

On 19 November 2012, the International Court of Justice gave its judgment concerning the Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia. This judgment includes several important issues which need serious consideration, such the as legal status of maritime features, the interpretation and application of Article 121 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, the methodology of maritime delimitations, the role of proportionality in maritime delimitations, and the impact of the judgment upon third states and effect of Article 59 of the ICJ Statute. Focusing on these issues, this contribution aims to analyse the judgment of 2012 from a viewpoint of the international law of the sea, in particular, the law of maritime delimitation.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Leiden Journal of International Law
Vol/bind	26
Udgave nummer	4
Sider (fra-til)	909-931
Antal sider	23
ISSN	0922-1565
Status	Udgivet - dec. 2013

Citationsformater

@article{3b1b452f58fa49e69c9d1886d3352e93,

title = "Reflections on the Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia before the International Court of Justice",

abstract = "On 19 November 2012, the International Court of Justice gave its judgment concerning the Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia. This judgment includes several important issues which need serious consideration, such the as legal status of maritime features, the interpretation and application of Article 121 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, the methodology of maritime delimitations, the role of proportionality in maritime delimitations, and the impact of the judgment upon third states and effect of Article 59 of the ICJ Statute. Focusing on these issues, this contribution aims to analyse the judgment of 2012 from a viewpoint of the international law of the sea, in particular, the law of maritime delimitation.",

author = "Yoshifumi Tanaka",

note = "Above title: Hague International Tribunals International Court of Justice",

year = "2013",

month = dec,

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "909--931",

journal = "Leiden Journal of International Law",

issn = "0922-1565",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflections on the Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia before the International Court of Justice

AU - Tanaka, Yoshifumi

N1 - Above title: Hague International Tribunals International Court of Justice

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - On 19 November 2012, the International Court of Justice gave its judgment concerning the Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia. This judgment includes several important issues which need serious consideration, such the as legal status of maritime features, the interpretation and application of Article 121 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, the methodology of maritime delimitations, the role of proportionality in maritime delimitations, and the impact of the judgment upon third states and effect of Article 59 of the ICJ Statute. Focusing on these issues, this contribution aims to analyse the judgment of 2012 from a viewpoint of the international law of the sea, in particular, the law of maritime delimitation.

AB - On 19 November 2012, the International Court of Justice gave its judgment concerning the Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia. This judgment includes several important issues which need serious consideration, such the as legal status of maritime features, the interpretation and application of Article 121 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, the methodology of maritime delimitations, the role of proportionality in maritime delimitations, and the impact of the judgment upon third states and effect of Article 59 of the ICJ Statute. Focusing on these issues, this contribution aims to analyse the judgment of 2012 from a viewpoint of the international law of the sea, in particular, the law of maritime delimitation.

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0922-1565

VL - 26

SP - 909

EP - 931

JO - Leiden Journal of International Law

JF - Leiden Journal of International Law

IS - 4

ER -

Reflections on the Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia before the International Court of Justice

Abstract

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater