Proactive employers and teachers’ working time regulation: Public sector industrial conflicts in Denmark and Norway

Mikkel Mailand

Proactive employers and teachers’ working time regulation: Public sector industrial conflicts in Denmark and Norway

FAOS

Abstract

Public sector industrial relations in Denmark are normally perceived as relatively consensual, and as a ‘model employer’ country with a strong collective bargaining tradition it is one of the countries where unilateral regulation could be least xpected. However, in 2013, a lockout without any prior strike or strike-warning in the bargaining area for primary and lower secondary education only, came to an end through legislative intervention. The article includes three main arguments. First, the government and the public employers took these drastic steps because various factors created a rare ‘window of opportunity’ for them. Second, the reason a Norwegian industrial conflict in 2014 with a very similar point of departure ended very differently was first and foremost that the Norwegian process was not embedded in politics and policy reform to the same extent as the Danish process. Third, the Danish case shows that Denmark might not have escaped the trend towards unilateralism seen across Europe.

Originalsprog	Dansk
Tidsskrift	Economic and Industrial Democracy
Sider (fra-til)	1-18
ISSN	0143-831X
Status	Accepteret/In press - aug. 2016

Adgang til dokumentet

http://10.1177/0143831X16657414

Citationsformater

@article{ce99786edc4b45e99fdd7608e67b155d,

title = "Proactive employers and teachers{\textquoteright} working time regulation: Public sector industrial conflicts in Denmark and Norway",

abstract = "Public sector industrial relations in Denmark are normally perceived as relatively consensual, and as a {\textquoteleft}model employer{\textquoteright} country with a strong collective bargaining tradition it is one of the countries where unilateral regulation could be least xpected. However, in 2013, a lockout without any prior strike or strike-warning in the bargaining area for primary and lower secondary education only, came to an end through legislative intervention. The article includes three main arguments. First, the government and the public employers took these drastic steps because various factors created a rare {\textquoteleft}window of opportunity{\textquoteright} for them. Second, the reason a Norwegian industrial conflict in 2014 with a very similar point of departure ended very differently was first and foremost that the Norwegian process was not embedded in politics and policy reform to the same extent as the Danish process. Third, the Danish case shows that Denmark might not have escaped the trend towards unilateralism seen across Europe.",

author = "Mikkel Mailand",

year = "2016",

month = aug,

language = "Dansk",

pages = "1--18",

journal = "Economic and Industrial Democracy",

issn = "0143-831X",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proactive employers and teachers’ working time regulation

T2 - Public sector industrial conflicts in Denmark and Norway

AU - Mailand, Mikkel

PY - 2016/8

Y1 - 2016/8

N2 - Public sector industrial relations in Denmark are normally perceived as relatively consensual, and as a ‘model employer’ country with a strong collective bargaining tradition it is one of the countries where unilateral regulation could be least xpected. However, in 2013, a lockout without any prior strike or strike-warning in the bargaining area for primary and lower secondary education only, came to an end through legislative intervention. The article includes three main arguments. First, the government and the public employers took these drastic steps because various factors created a rare ‘window of opportunity’ for them. Second, the reason a Norwegian industrial conflict in 2014 with a very similar point of departure ended very differently was first and foremost that the Norwegian process was not embedded in politics and policy reform to the same extent as the Danish process. Third, the Danish case shows that Denmark might not have escaped the trend towards unilateralism seen across Europe.

AB - Public sector industrial relations in Denmark are normally perceived as relatively consensual, and as a ‘model employer’ country with a strong collective bargaining tradition it is one of the countries where unilateral regulation could be least xpected. However, in 2013, a lockout without any prior strike or strike-warning in the bargaining area for primary and lower secondary education only, came to an end through legislative intervention. The article includes three main arguments. First, the government and the public employers took these drastic steps because various factors created a rare ‘window of opportunity’ for them. Second, the reason a Norwegian industrial conflict in 2014 with a very similar point of departure ended very differently was first and foremost that the Norwegian process was not embedded in politics and policy reform to the same extent as the Danish process. Third, the Danish case shows that Denmark might not have escaped the trend towards unilateralism seen across Europe.

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

SN - 0143-831X

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Economic and Industrial Democracy

JF - Economic and Industrial Democracy

ER -